Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charging the PTO is more than fair if:
- The PTO is a separate non-profit, AND
- The building/space is rented by the charter school with a specific lease/use agreement, AND
- The PTO meetings are held outside of normal business hours, requiring paid overtime to hourly employees security, custodial, or administrator supervision to provide building access during these hours.
Carry on.
The PTO is better off using the meeting room at the closest library. It's crazy to pay the school to use their space while raising money for THE SCHOOL.
It's not "their space". The space is rented by the school from a private owner to be used during certain hours. Anything outside of that is not just "free time". Security guards and custodians don't volunteer to be there, and shouldn't be asked to. There are also liability and insurance issues for gatherings and events.
Even DCPL libraries require room reservations, and in some cases charge fees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charging the PTO is more than fair if:
- The PTO is a separate non-profit, AND
- The building/space is rented by the charter school with a specific lease/use agreement, AND
- The PTO meetings are held outside of normal business hours, requiring paid overtime to hourly employees security, custodial, or administrator supervision to provide building access during these hours.
Carry on.
The PTO is better off using the meeting room at the closest library. It's crazy to pay the school to use their space while raising money for THE SCHOOL.
Anonymous wrote:All the problems at SSMA and "Dr" R spends her time extracting rent from the community association. What a joke. SSMA's board needs to grow a spine and remove her.
Anonymous wrote:Charging the PTO is more than fair if:
- The PTO is a separate non-profit, AND
- The building/space is rented by the charter school with a specific lease/use agreement, AND
- The PTO meetings are held outside of normal business hours, requiring paid overtime to hourly employees security, custodial, or administrator supervision to provide building access during these hours.
Carry on.
Anonymous wrote:If the PTA was a truly armslength organization with tons of cash, sure. But PTOs are often shoestring operations with few people who do everything and the schools should be happy to get whatever they earn and offer, not charge them rent. That’s the sign of a terrible working relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Ya'll need to leave SSMA alone and stop airing their school business on here.
Anonymous wrote:Ya'll need to leave SSMA alone and stop airing their school business on here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here: DCPS lists "reduced rate" qualifiers
https://dcps.dc.gov/page/use-school-facilities-and-grounds
https://dcps.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dcps/publication/attachments/DCPS%20Fee%20Schedule%20for%20Space%209-4-1990.pdf
So in DCPS PTOs are supposed to pay something. Not sure if ours actually does.
But this is a Public Charter School - the core of independence is they do not need to file DCPS regulations [they do need to follow OSSE]