Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 10:16     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
What are thoughts on creating only 1 Spanish immersion school?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 10:05     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't even understand-- does Reed show up with boundaries in either of these maps?


Yes, in the “for discussion only” map.


So that brown patch is Reed?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 10:00     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:I don't even understand-- does Reed show up with boundaries in either of these maps?


Yes, in the “for discussion only” map.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:50     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:Talk about gerrymandering. Looks like an effort to split up some of the poverty along the pike, which is a good thing. But it makes other schools less diverse, such as fleet and Abingdon. Barcroft looks like it is screwed though. That should just be a choice school. It gets the bad end of the stick every time.

Demographics need to accompany this map. As do streets.



Disagree that this would screw Barcroft. It looks like it takes Barcroft apartments out of Barcroft, leaving it with only Arlington Mill. Questionable from Barrett's perspective though.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:45     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Immersion to Carlin Springs, let's go.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:43     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And now the link is down... the plot thickens?


I'm looking at it still. Just refreshed and it's still there.


I just refreshed and it's gone!
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:40     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:And now the link is down... the plot thickens?


I'm looking at it still. Just refreshed and it's still there.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:40     Subject: Re:Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
This reveals a lot. They want people to react strongly to this. That way they can make the case for option school moves.

They've been saying all along if they can't move programs they'll have to craft crazy boundaries. Take your pick.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:37     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
And now the link is down... the plot thickens?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:36     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
I don't even understand-- does Reed show up with boundaries in either of these maps?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:31     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nice, I had been hoping they would release a map like this. BTW I like the people who want street names so they can decide whether or not they care.


I’m one of those parents . Based on comparison to the current map, I’m fairly sure the western “discussion” boundary for Taylor is Lorcom. Maywood, how do we feel about going to ASF?

That part of the map was so bizarre -- why would they move that part of Taylor (north of lee highway, not in the walk zone for any school) into ASFS? I get moving the walk zone for asfs, and moving western lyon village because its contigous and a more natural boundary, but why move maywood unless you're trying to keep the current taylor together and move it as a community to asfs? For demographic reasons maybe? Though for swap proponents, it looks like most of ASFS stays together in the proposal -- just gets moved all together to Taylor.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:16     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nice, I had been hoping they would release a map like this. BTW I like the people who want street names so they can decide whether or not they care.


I’m one of those parents . Based on comparison to the current map, I’m fairly sure the western “discussion” boundary for Taylor is Lorcom. Maywood, how do we feel about going to ASF?


I wouldn’t read too much into this map. It’s just demonstrating that option schools need to move.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:14     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:Nice, I had been hoping they would release a map like this. BTW I like the people who want street names so they can decide whether or not they care.


I’m one of those parents . Based on comparison to the current map, I’m fairly sure the western “discussion” boundary for Taylor is Lorcom. Maywood, how do we feel about going to ASF?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 09:04     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/What-If-BScenario_19ESPlanning.png


I think this would be more useful with street names because you kind of have to guess at some of this- but I think it is a good move for APS to put this out now. Especially given that Westover is currently gearing up to fight for Reed as neighborhood- and Key is fighting full throated to keep immersion their. It will show Westover that banding together with Key to stop Key from moving will actually result in not good things for Westover or anyone else in the county.


Westover doesn’t need to fight to keep Reed a neighborhood school- that’s a done deal, as verified by one of the stated objectives of this boundary process:

Create attendance zones for the new school at Reed and for Arlington Science Focus School to be situated within its boundaries



Seems counter-intuitive to put ASFS in it's boundary and then take Carlin Springs out of it's boundary. Hope they trying to make a case for it to be a choice location...
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2019 08:52     Subject: Discussion Boundary Map out for APS- elementary schools
Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/What-If-BScenario_19ESPlanning.png


I think this would be more useful with street names because you kind of have to guess at some of this- but I think it is a good move for APS to put this out now. Especially given that Westover is currently gearing up to fight for Reed as neighborhood- and Key is fighting full throated to keep immersion their. It will show Westover that banding together with Key to stop Key from moving will actually result in not good things for Westover or anyone else in the county.


Westover doesn’t need to fight to keep Reed a neighborhood school- that’s a done deal, as verified by one of the stated objectives of this boundary process:

Create attendance zones for the new school at Reed and for Arlington Science Focus School to be situated within its boundaries