Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:case study in dumb white liberals thinking they know what is best for the black community
PP here. You can call me names (not accurate, BTW), and maybe we should just agree to disagree. But the bottom line for me is that some of these charter schools, maybe KIPP most notably, are providing opportunities that have never been there before. They're literally changing these kids' lives. I have a hard time not supporting that.
Anonymous wrote:case study in dumb white liberals thinking they know what is best for the black community
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
What in the recent (~25 year) history of DCPS makes you think that they can magically "fix" these schools?
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Then close the failing DCPS schools and redirect the funds to better support students. Propping up failing, under-enrolled schools is not a strategy.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Hooray! It's about time Wards 7 & 8 get the top-performing schools they deserve. We should be celebrating this and celebrating KIPP taking Ferebee-Hope.
DCPS has improved significantly at the elementary and middle school level in the past 25 years and I believe those gains will filter up, along with the one-star money and Connected Schols program.
DCPS cannot close Anacostia and Ballou unless the kids have somewhere to go. Are the charters volunteering to take all those kids, all grades, all special needs, any day of the year? I doubt it. They would have a much harder time claiming to be "successful" if they had to do the work DCPS does.
There are plenty of failing charters the PCSB could focus on improving, rather than letting them malinger for 5 years at a time and then disrupting all the kids with closure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
What in the recent (~25 year) history of DCPS makes you think that they can magically "fix" these schools?
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Then close the failing DCPS schools and redirect the funds to better support students. Propping up failing, under-enrolled schools is not a strategy.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Hooray! It's about time Wards 7 & 8 get the top-performing schools they deserve. We should be celebrating this and celebrating KIPP taking Ferebee-Hope.
DCPS has improved significantly at the elementary and middle school level in the past 25 years and I believe those gains will filter up, along with the one-star money and Connected Schols program.
DCPS cannot close Anacostia and Ballou unless the kids have somewhere to go. Are the charters volunteering to take all those kids, all grades, all special needs, any day of the year? I doubt it. They would have a much harder time claiming to be "successful" if they had to do the work DCPS does.
There are plenty of failing charters the PCSB could focus on improving, rather than letting them malinger for 5 years at a time and then disrupting all the kids with closure.
I absolutely think they should close failing charters. KIPP does not have any failing charters. And, yes, KIPP is volunteering to take ALL of the kids who currently go to Anacostia and Ballou... if they apply to KIPP through the lottery. Yes, you need backup schools for kids that don't want KIPP or that it doesn't work for, but actually eliminating one of Anacostia and Ballou is absolutely a goal.
"Doesn't work out" meaning that KIPP pushes them out for being difficult to deal with, putting the hard work on DCPS instead. Sorry but everyonr has the right to an education within a reasonable commute so you need both schools. Try to merge them and you run into neighborhood rivalry violence.
Taking all kids through the lottery is not the same thing at all. It is much, much easier. A cop-out to pretend it is the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
What in the recent (~25 year) history of DCPS makes you think that they can magically "fix" these schools?
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Then close the failing DCPS schools and redirect the funds to better support students. Propping up failing, under-enrolled schools is not a strategy.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Hooray! It's about time Wards 7 & 8 get the top-performing schools they deserve. We should be celebrating this and celebrating KIPP taking Ferebee-Hope.
DCPS has improved significantly at the elementary and middle school level in the past 25 years and I believe those gains will filter up, along with the one-star money and Connected Schols program.
DCPS cannot close Anacostia and Ballou unless the kids have somewhere to go. Are the charters volunteering to take all those kids, all grades, all special needs, any day of the year? I doubt it. They would have a much harder time claiming to be "successful" if they had to do the work DCPS does.
There are plenty of failing charters the PCSB could focus on improving, rather than letting them malinger for 5 years at a time and then disrupting all the kids with closure.
I absolutely think they should close failing charters. KIPP does not have any failing charters. And, yes, KIPP is volunteering to take ALL of the kids who currently go to Anacostia and Ballou... if they apply to KIPP through the lottery. Yes, you need backup schools for kids that don't want KIPP or that it doesn't work for, but actually eliminating one of Anacostia and Ballou is absolutely a goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
What in the recent (~25 year) history of DCPS makes you think that they can magically "fix" these schools?
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Then close the failing DCPS schools and redirect the funds to better support students. Propping up failing, under-enrolled schools is not a strategy.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Hooray! It's about time Wards 7 & 8 get the top-performing schools they deserve. We should be celebrating this and celebrating KIPP taking Ferebee-Hope.
DCPS has improved significantly at the elementary and middle school level in the past 25 years and I believe those gains will filter up, along with the one-star money and Connected Schols program.
DCPS cannot close Anacostia and Ballou unless the kids have somewhere to go. Are the charters volunteering to take all those kids, all grades, all special needs, any day of the year? I doubt it. They would have a much harder time claiming to be "successful" if they had to do the work DCPS does.
There are plenty of failing charters the PCSB could focus on improving, rather than letting them malinger for 5 years at a time and then disrupting all the kids with closure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
What in the recent (~25 year) history of DCPS makes you think that they can magically "fix" these schools?
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Then close the failing DCPS schools and redirect the funds to better support students. Propping up failing, under-enrolled schools is not a strategy.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Hooray! It's about time Wards 7 & 8 get the top-performing schools they deserve. We should be celebrating this and celebrating KIPP taking Ferebee-Hope.
Anonymous wrote: Because we should be fixing the schools that we already have, rather than undermining them with new openings.
Anonymous wrote: Because it is a waste of money to operate so many half-empty schools.
Anonymous wrote: Because EOTR is already getting Bard and Latin II.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin has refused to open next year because they "can't find a building" (read: they are testing to see if they're really going to be forced to open EOTR). Bard and KIPP basically couldn't be differently focused. KIPP isn't my cup of tee, but they unquestionably get the best results consistently for families EOTR and the demand is there... so who am I to tell them that they should prefer the social emotional fluffy rainbows focused education I want for my UMC high-achieving kid with zero of the challenges their kids routine face?
Yes. for all that I roll my eyes at the idea that "choice" will save us all ... if there is demand for KIPP, then it's totally appropriate that they build another school.
Anonymous wrote:Latin has refused to open next year because they "can't find a building" (read: they are testing to see if they're really going to be forced to open EOTR). Bard and KIPP basically couldn't be differently focused. KIPP isn't my cup of tee, but they unquestionably get the best results consistently for families EOTR and the demand is there... so who am I to tell them that they should prefer the social emotional fluffy rainbows focused education I want for my UMC high-achieving kid with zero of the challenges their kids routine face?