Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP most of these Stats are incorrect or VERY old. The acceptance rate for Cornell is 8% and for Emory is 15% as of last year. This data you posted is 5 years old.
The OP said it's 2015 data. Acceptance rate may be different now due to larger number of applicants but everything else about the schools is pretty much same and the school fundamentals won't drastically change within a few years.
Anonymous wrote:OP most of these Stats are incorrect or VERY old. The acceptance rate for Cornell is 8% and for Emory is 15% as of last year. This data you posted is 5 years old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just sort the table based on the 75 percentile SAT scores, it pretty much gives you the picture what school student body qualities are. Some are called "elite" for a reason. Not necessarily true for an individual student, but true for the whole student body. No need for the endless argument.
CalTech 1600
Harvard 1600
Princeton 1600
Chicago 1590
Yale 1590
Columbia 1570
MIT 1570
Stanford 1570
Vanderbilt 1570
Dartmouth 1560
Harvey Mudd 1560
Williams 1560
Duke 1550
Northwestern 1550
Rice 1550
WashU 1550
Brown 1540
Pomona 1540
UPenn 1540
Amherst 1530
CMU 1530
Swarthmore 1530
Carleton 1520
Cornell 1520
Notre Dame 1520
Tufts 1520
That Harvard number is surprising given all the media stories about how many legacies they admit.
So all Harvard legacies are amazingly smart?
Anonymous wrote:So you're saying that non-STEM, non-Computer Science topics are inherently Social Justice Warrior? Nice. Glad the empirical world is so comfortable for you, while the realm of real-world humanity isn't.
Anonymous wrote:I thought that by maximizing these measures, one could minimize the SJW horseshit that is prevalent in some schools.
+1000
Also, I'm glad to see another "spreadsheet parent".
Anonymous wrote:I could see you put in lots of effort. However, there are many errors, especially the 0% that you put in were all wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Seems a little over the top. Why do we care where you are targeting your kid to get in except to offer you help? Really, do you honestly think the only path to academia is from a SLAC? Just because that’s what the SLAC league tells you doesn’t mean that’s the whole truth. CS is not known as a topic to engender many to pursue advanced degrees, so pretty limited pool of academics in that topic anyway.
Anonymous wrote:There's a great app called CollegeHunch that will crunch and compare for you -- much easier!
Anonymous wrote:Thank you OP!!
Now, it is difficult to see the numbers...could you somehow rank them from less BS to more BS?
Anonymous wrote:Just sort the table based on the 75 percentile SAT scores, it pretty much gives you the picture what school student body qualities are. Some are called "elite" for a reason. Not necessarily true for an individual student, but true for the whole student body. No need for the endless argument.
CalTech 1600
Harvard 1600
Princeton 1600
Chicago 1590
Yale 1590
Columbia 1570
MIT 1570
Stanford 1570
Vanderbilt 1570
Dartmouth 1560
Harvey Mudd 1560
Williams 1560
Duke 1550
Northwestern 1550
Rice 1550
WashU 1550
Brown 1540
Pomona 1540
UPenn 1540
Amherst 1530
CMU 1530
Swarthmore 1530
Carleton 1520
Cornell 1520
Notre Dame 1520
Tufts 1520
Anonymous wrote:Someone is way too invested in their kids application process.
Anonymous wrote:Someone is way too invested in their kids application process.