Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ellington did reasonable on PARCC - 88% 3+ on ELA, 83% 3+ on Math. Your kids won’t be surrounded by morons by any means.
Sure but 3 isn’t even competency at grade level. That’s a 4. DC scores are abysmal and so are what people consider “good”. That doesnat I press me at the high school level.
Typo, doesn’t impress
Then don't have your kid apply. I don't think OP's question was whether you personally are impressed with Ellington or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ellington did reasonable on PARCC - 88% 3+ on ELA, 83% 3+ on Math. Your kids won’t be surrounded by morons by any means.
Sure but 3 isn’t even competency at grade level. That’s a 4. DC scores are abysmal and so are what people consider “good”. That doesnat I press me at the high school level.
Typo, doesn’t impress
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ellington did reasonable on PARCC - 88% 3+ on ELA, 83% 3+ on Math. Your kids won’t be surrounded by morons by any means.
Sure but 3 isn’t even competency at grade level. That’s a 4. DC scores are abysmal and so are what people consider “good”. That doesnat I press me at the high school level.
Anonymous wrote:Ellington did reasonable on PARCC - 88% 3+ on ELA, 83% 3+ on Math. Your kids won’t be surrounded by morons by any means.
Anonymous wrote:We are acquaintances of two students who go there.
The parents told me there are plenty of AP classes for students who want them - I think they said about 11 or 12? Both families said it's for kids who are serious about whatever their art is, and are willing to put the time in to their art and truly enjoy spending their time that way. One may continue to study the art in college, the other may not but will still have it in his life. However, both are having a good experience overall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be clear, Duke Ellington is ranked #5 in the city on academics (USNWR), but of the top 5 it is the only one that does not accept kids based on academics. Entry is solely based on the audition, so saying Duke does not do well in academics ignores the fact that (a) arts is not included in the rankings and (b) it stands at #5 with many kids coming in with far lower academic standing than SWW, Banneker, McKinley. Also many Duke grads do not go into the arts for college or a profession, but the training is pre-professional, so as others said, if your child is a "like" the arts person and not a "love the arts" person, a 8:30-5pm day will not serve them well.
To be ranked #5 in DC for academics is actually pretty bad. Our #1-3 schools don’t hold a candle academically to many large suburban public high schools.
As others have said, you pick DE if you are hoping to make it in the arts professionally. Risky choice for anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be clear, Duke Ellington is ranked #5 in the city on academics (USNWR), but of the top 5 it is the only one that does not accept kids based on academics. Entry is solely based on the audition, so saying Duke does not do well in academics ignores the fact that (a) arts is not included in the rankings and (b) it stands at #5 with many kids coming in with far lower academic standing than SWW, Banneker, McKinley. Also many Duke grads do not go into the arts for college or a profession, but the training is pre-professional, so as others said, if your child is a "like" the arts person and not a "love the arts" person, a 8:30-5pm day will not serve them well.
Do people really refer to the school as "Duke" now? All the other schools named after people go by the person's last name (like Banneker and McKinley above). Duke just sounds off.
DESA, Ellington and Duke and used pretty interchangeably. On a listserv when people are typing quickly, Duke seems fine.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if they are planning to expand the number of students at Duke? Why else is half the school empty? Are there plans to use that space for something else?
Anonymous wrote:To be clear, Duke Ellington is ranked #5 in the city on academics (USNWR), but of the top 5 it is the only one that does not accept kids based on academics. Entry is solely based on the audition, so saying Duke does not do well in academics ignores the fact that (a) arts is not included in the rankings and (b) it stands at #5 with many kids coming in with far lower academic standing than SWW, Banneker, McKinley. Also many Duke grads do not go into the arts for college or a profession, but the training is pre-professional, so as others said, if your child is a "like" the arts person and not a "love the arts" person, a 8:30-5pm day will not serve them well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be clear, Duke Ellington is ranked #5 in the city on academics (USNWR), but of the top 5 it is the only one that does not accept kids based on academics. Entry is solely based on the audition, so saying Duke does not do well in academics ignores the fact that (a) arts is not included in the rankings and (b) it stands at #5 with many kids coming in with far lower academic standing than SWW, Banneker, McKinley. Also many Duke grads do not go into the arts for college or a profession, but the training is pre-professional, so as others said, if your child is a "like" the arts person and not a "love the arts" person, a 8:30-5pm day will not serve them well.
Do people really refer to the school as "Duke" now? All the other schools named after people go by the person's last name (like Banneker and McKinley above). Duke just sounds off.
My daughter went there for a year and her friends all referred to it that way. Also want to support what the pp said. Ellington is for kids who want pre-professional training and it's very siloed. My kid went for literary media and I was very pleased with how much they required the kids to write and how many contacts they had with professional writers but she couldn't have tried out for the fall play or the choir. You pretty much go in for one area and you focus strongly in that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be clear, Duke Ellington is ranked #5 in the city on academics (USNWR), but of the top 5 it is the only one that does not accept kids based on academics. Entry is solely based on the audition, so saying Duke does not do well in academics ignores the fact that (a) arts is not included in the rankings and (b) it stands at #5 with many kids coming in with far lower academic standing than SWW, Banneker, McKinley. Also many Duke grads do not go into the arts for college or a profession, but the training is pre-professional, so as others said, if your child is a "like" the arts person and not a "love the arts" person, a 8:30-5pm day will not serve them well.
Do people really refer to the school as "Duke" now? All the other schools named after people go by the person's last name (like Banneker and McKinley above). Duke just sounds off.