Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Full tuition to TJ kids who apply”? Did you intend to make it sound like every TJ kid was offered this? Because that’s not true.
Don't let the facts get in the way.
Okay. To be clear, every kid is not getting full tuition. But it seems that every kid I know who applied got an initial offer that undercut VT. Superstars maxed out. And kids who were in the top 2/3 or so (say 4.0w/1500) and who hung on until April and evaluated their options— just didn’t give them an early answer— got an unsolicited merit offer raise in the spring, often to full tuition. They being aggressive with merit aid. And most (but not all) get an honors college offer.
Better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were very surprised at how much we liked it when DC visited. Good academics, nicer campus than we imagined, and a very positive vibe from the students. It reminded me of Richmond to the extent that both are working aggressively to break into more of a national ranking, except Pitt seems more generous with aid which is probably a function of size. Give it 4-5 years and Pitt will probably be much more difficult to get into.
A quick glance at both common data sets demonstrates that Pitt isn’t even close to being as generous with aid of either the need- or merit-based variety.
Anonymous wrote:My kid attended Pitt.
The positives were that it’s a good school with lots of solid kids in a very student-friendly area in an interesting city that is convenient to the DC area. There are many different majors. There is a sizable contingent of students from the area and Pitt runs buses from Pitt to Montgomery Mall before and after major holidays. For the most part, the kids seem happy to be there.
The kids are less spoiled than at some of the public and private high schools in the DC region. DS started working part-time while there, because he saw his friends working part-time, even though we hadn’t pushed him to get a job. That work ethic stayed with him post-Pitt.
The negatives were that it wasn’t always easy to get the classes he wanted; some classes were taught by grad students who lacked teaching skills; the weather can be very gloomy; and some of the off-campus housing in Oakland exemplifies a “student ghetto.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were very surprised at how much we liked it when DC visited. Good academics, nicer campus than we imagined, and a very positive vibe from the students. It reminded me of Richmond to the extent that both are working aggressively to break into more of a national ranking, except Pitt seems more generous with aid which is probably a function of size. Give it 4-5 years and Pitt will probably be much more difficult to get into.
A quick glance at both common data sets demonstrates that Pitt isn’t even close to being as generous with aid of either the need- or merit-based variety.
Anonymous wrote:We were very surprised at how much we liked it when DC visited. Good academics, nicer campus than we imagined, and a very positive vibe from the students. It reminded me of Richmond to the extent that both are working aggressively to break into more of a national ranking, except Pitt seems more generous with aid which is probably a function of size. Give it 4-5 years and Pitt will probably be much more difficult to get into.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't there approximately 100 threads on this very topic? Seems like there is one a week. Have you searched the forum?
Anonymous wrote:We were very surprised at how much we liked it when DC visited. Good academics, nicer campus than we imagined, and a very positive vibe from the students. It reminded me of Richmond to the extent that both are working aggressively to break into more of a national ranking, except Pitt seems more generous with aid which is probably a function of size. Give it 4-5 years and Pitt will probably be much more difficult to get into.
Anonymous wrote:We were very surprised at how much we liked it when DC visited. Good academics, nicer campus than we imagined, and a very positive vibe from the students. It reminded me of Richmond to the extent that both are working aggressively to break into more of a national ranking, except Pitt seems more generous with aid which is probably a function of size. Give it 4-5 years and Pitt will probably be much more difficult to get into.
Anonymous wrote:So, I have a question about Pitt and their rolling admissions. It seems like EVERYONE applies there now. So …
1.) Is this damaging to kids like mine, who I would call a TRUE fit for Pitt? Not top of the class, just a solid student.
2.) Is this messing up their yield? Like, are the kids who might also get into UVa or Penn, etc., using it as a safety school, getting in, then deciding on better colleges?