Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
You understand that allotting all your zero-sum leave toward women perpetuates that women are the ones who have to sacrifice their career goals to provide childcare as a primary parent?
Most (if not all) of the men I know who take "paternity leave" do so concurrently with their wives. They have no interest in being the sole caretaker of the baby. Its just an extra long free vacation for them, and its costing companies time and resources that could go to women, which people on this board seem to think the women desperately need and I happen to agree.
We can say we think that women/men should get equal time 6, 9, 12+ months off but that is not realistic. We have to take baby steps.
To the adopting PP, yes I think adopting mothers should get the same time as mothers who gave birth. I personally think maternity leave is separate from "healing from childbirth" which in my case (and many cases) takes maybe a week, if that. Mothers have a different need to be with their babies than fathers do. Its just biological. I'm married to a wonderful man who is an involved father and a 50/50 partner. He took 2 weeks vacation with the birth of each of our children (he did not receive paternity leave either time) He helped me and hung out with the babies and then he went back to work. He was fine. And I was fine with him going back.
All this whining about paternity leave is hurting women. Sorry, its true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
You understand that allotting all your zero-sum leave toward women perpetuates that women are the ones who have to sacrifice their career goals to provide childcare as a primary parent?
Most (if not all) of the men I know who take "paternity leave" do so concurrently with their wives. They have no interest in being the sole caretaker of the baby. Its just an extra long free vacation for them, and its costing companies time and resources that could go to women, which people on this board seem to think the women desperately need and I happen to agree.
We can say we think that women/men should get equal time 6, 9, 12+ months off but that is not realistic. We have to take baby steps.
To the adopting PP, yes I think adopting mothers should get the same time as mothers who gave birth. I personally think maternity leave is separate from "healing from childbirth" which in my case (and many cases) takes maybe a week, if that. Mothers have a different need to be with their babies than fathers do. Its just biological. I'm married to a wonderful man who is an involved father and a 50/50 partner. He took 2 weeks vacation with the birth of each of our children (he did not receive paternity leave either time) He helped me and hung out with the babies and then he went back to work. He was fine. And I was fine with him going back.
All this whining about paternity leave is hurting women. Sorry, its true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
You understand that allotting all your zero-sum leave toward women perpetuates that women are the ones who have to sacrifice their career goals to provide childcare as a primary parent?
Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different![/quote
So what’s your take on an adoptive mother with a newborn? Would you be okay with her getting 12+ weeks of maternity leave? If so, please explain how that’s different from paternity leave. In both these case, neither parent needs time to heal from childbirth nor do they need time to establish a nursing schedule.
I await your response.
Anonymous wrote:Here is my (unpopular) opinion. It would be easier to push through more generous maternal leave policies if we weren't simultaneously also trying to push through ridiculous (IMO) paternal leave policies. Companies have only so much money/time off to give. It is a zero sum game. Men do not need 12+ weeks of paternity leave. Newsflash, men and women are different!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you take unpaid leave to extend to 12 or 16 weeks? What is your childcare plan for next week?
This. Have your doctor sign off on FMLA. You get 12 weeks by law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you take unpaid leave to extend to 12 or 16 weeks? What is your childcare plan for next week?
This. Have your doctor sign off on FMLA. You get 12 weeks by law.
THIS don't make a decision at 6 weeks. Take 12 weeks and then you will know what is right for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you take unpaid leave to extend to 12 or 16 weeks? What is your childcare plan for next week?
This. Have your doctor sign off on FMLA. You get 12 weeks by law.
THIS don't make a decision at 6 weeks. Take 12 weeks and then you will know what is right for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:6 weeks is ridiculous OP. You should have planned better. Now, either your baby is in a bad situation. I suggest you get a nanny so at least your kid won’t be subjected to daycare this young (and I’m a daycare mom).
And that should say - either your baby or your boss is in a bad situation
Your privilege is showing. Many of us go back to work after 6 weeks. My mom and MIL each spent a week with the baby, then baby started daycare at 9 weeks. Ideal? No. Is he fine? Absolutely. Healthy and happy and thriving 6 yo now.
This is harsh but you shouldn’t have a child if you have to return to work at six weeks. We don’t have paid leave in this country because women continue to have children under abysmal conditions.