Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lean left and have immigrant parents, but have no problem with what the officer did.

None of us get to do what we want without repercussion. You are undocumented, AND you drive without a license (and presumably without insurance), AND you get into an accident? Yeah sorry, there are consequences.

I completely understand a human being seeking a better life, but this person should not be on the road.

+1

+2

Also have immigrant parents and find this kind of thing infuriating

+3
Fairfax County residents need to make their voices heard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lean left and have immigrant parents, but have no problem with what the officer did.

None of us get to do what we want without repercussion. You are undocumented, AND you drive without a license (and presumably without insurance), AND you get into an accident? Yeah sorry, there are consequences.

I completely understand a human being seeking a better life, but this person should not be on the road.

+1

+2

Also have immigrant parents and find this kind of thing infuriating

"...the officer received notification from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE), that the driver was wanted by ICE for an administrative violation warrant on file for the failure to appear for a deportation hearing."

This guy was a fugitive from the law. He failed to appear!!!

What do you think would happen if an American citizen had failed to appear for a hearing, got in a traffic accident and didn't have a license?????

This is lunacy.

Anonymous wrote:I lean left and have immigrant parents, but have no problem with what the officer did.

None of us get to do what we want without repercussion. You are undocumented, AND you drive without a license (and presumably without insurance), AND you get into an accident? Yeah sorry, there are consequences.

I completely understand a human being seeking a better life, but this person should not be on the road.

+1

I lean left and have immigrant parents, but have no problem with what the officer did.

None of us get to do what we want without repercussion. You are undocumented, AND you drive without a license (and presumably without insurance), AND you get into an accident? Yeah sorry, there are consequences.

I completely understand a human being seeking a better life, but this person should not be on the road.

Giving, not given

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would criminal law enforcement be involved in administrative enforcement?

Why would someone knowingly come here in violation of federal law, and then operate a motor vehicle without a license or insurance in violation of Virginia law?

Have you spent any time wondering about that?

No, you say?

Shocking.

Why would someone knowingly come here in violation of federal law? For an opportunity for a better life.

Why would someone operate a motor vehicle without a license or insurance in violation of Virginia law? Because to get places in Virginia, you basically have to drive.

This isn't complicated. If you think it is, that's shocking.

Do I need to post the photo of Schumer sleeping through the angel mom talk my friend’s wife was given about her son, who was killed by an illegal alien? His leg got crushed and thus trapped under the truck, which caught on fire. He burned alive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would criminal law enforcement be involved in administrative enforcement?

Why would someone knowingly come here in violation of federal law, and then operate a motor vehicle without a license or insurance in violation of Virginia law?

Have you spent any time wondering about that?

No, you say?


Shocking.

Do you get to pick and choose laws?

Anonymous wrote:Why would criminal law enforcement be involved in administrative enforcement?

From the news release " ICE for an administrative violation warrant on file for the failure to appear for a deportation hearing." No license, no insurance, failure to appear for a deportation hearing. Out of the vast taxes we pay to local, state, and federal , how many of us care which entity deals with this?

Yale MIT study had about 22m. No one knows the number illegally present. Fairfax County gets one of the highest per county numbers of unaccompanied minors released to sponsors in the country. UAC released by ORR are solid numbers so FX could have one of the highest illegally present counts.

The subject was detained by ICE for 3 hours and released wearing an ankle bracelet. Assume he/she will show up for any future deportation hearings.

The Code of Virginia - law- allows the FCPD officer to inform ICE. Is Fairfax County in Virginia? Yes. This was a car accident but could have been murder, rape, arson, burglary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And, when a police officer - a person who has sworn to uphold the law - finds that a person involved in a traffic accident doesn't have a license to operate a vehicle AND is unlawfully in this country is reprimanded for upholding the law, there is a problem.

Nope. That's not what he was reprimanded for. Read the OP.

I am the OP. He was reprimanded for upholding the law.

OK, if you're the OP, then please read the text you copy-and-pasted into your post. That's not what he was reprimanded for.

It would seem that "any other violation of the law" would be operating a motor vehicle without a license.

Did you read the words around that phrase?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And, when a police officer - a person who has sworn to uphold the law - finds that a person involved in a traffic accident doesn't have a license to operate a vehicle AND is unlawfully in this country is reprimanded for upholding the law, there is a problem.

Nope. That's not what he was reprimanded for. Read the OP.

I am the OP. He was reprimanded for upholding the law.

OK, if you're the OP, then please read the text you copy-and-pasted into your post. That's not what he was reprimanded for.

It would seem that "any other violation of the law" would be operating a motor vehicle without a license.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And, when a police officer - a person who has sworn to uphold the law - finds that a person involved in a traffic accident doesn't have a license to operate a vehicle AND is unlawfully in this country is reprimanded for upholding the law, there is a problem.

Nope. That's not what he was reprimanded for. Read the OP.

I am the OP. He was reprimanded for upholding the law.

OK, if you're the OP, then please read the text you copy-and-pasted into your post. That's not what he was reprimanded for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And, when a police officer - a person who has sworn to uphold the law - finds that a person involved in a traffic accident doesn't have a license to operate a vehicle AND is unlawfully in this country is reprimanded for upholding the law, there is a problem.

Nope. That's not what he was reprimanded for. Read the OP.

I am the OP. He was reprimanded for upholding the law.

DP, but no. He was reprimanded for deliberately violating a regulation he didn’t like.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with it. LEOs don’t get to make up their own rules as they go along, that makes us all less safe.

Who made up rule FCPD General Order 601-Arrest procedures (VIII c. 5. e.)? That's the question.

Someone with the authority to do so, unlike this rogue cop.

Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with it. LEOs don’t get to make up their own rules as they go along, that makes us all less safe.

Who made up rule FCPD General Order 601-Arrest procedures (VIII c. 5. e.)? That's the question.