Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox 5 is fine.
Sinclair's WJLA 7 news is partisan junk. Sinclair makes local affiliates run segments of right wing disinformation and opinions. Here's a stunning montage of local news anchors reading Sinclair's statement all over the country -- clearly not their personal viewpoint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
I fail to see the scandal here? What’s wrong with journalists making a pledge of objectivity and promising to be free of bias?
Isn’t that sorta the point of journalism? Reporting the facts - JUST the facts - and letting people decide for themselves?
What’s wrong with that?
Not the poster who shared that link, but I guess nothing's wrong with pledging to be free of objectivity...except it wasn't something the journalists were saying for themselves, it was mandated that they read that statement on air by higher ups who were pushing back on "liberal" media bias.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do people really watch local news?
I'm 30 years old and I don't know anyone in my generation who watches cable news. I have a WaPo subscription and read news online, for the most part, it's WaPo, The Economist, 538 (Nate Silver), sometimes BBC, and then Bethesda Beat and Maryland Matters for local. I guess WAMU counts as a local station I'll selectively stream online.
But who actually watches broadcast cable networks? Do y'all have a landline too? A rotary phone? Are these the people voting for Joe Biden?
I'm 45 and this sounds like me and my immediate peer group. Too busy to sit around watching local news or cable news. Seems like most listen to NPR or read similar news sources online.
The only people I know for sure watch TV news are my ILs. They play FoxNews all day, every day. Which is why we don't go over there anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Do people really watch local news?
I'm 30 years old and I don't know anyone in my generation who watches cable news. I have a WaPo subscription and read news online, for the most part, it's WaPo, The Economist, 538 (Nate Silver), sometimes BBC, and then Bethesda Beat and Maryland Matters for local. I guess WAMU counts as a local station I'll selectively stream online.
But who actually watches broadcast cable networks? Do y'all have a landline too? A rotary phone? Are these the people voting for Joe Biden?
Anonymous wrote:Do people really watch local news?
I'm 30 years old and I don't know anyone in my generation who watches cable news. I have a WaPo subscription and read news online, for the most part, it's WaPo, The Economist, 538 (Nate Silver), sometimes BBC, and then Bethesda Beat and Maryland Matters for local. I guess WAMU counts as a local station I'll selectively stream online.
But who actually watches broadcast cable networks? Do y'all have a landline too? A rotary phone? Are these the people voting for Joe Biden?
Anonymous wrote:Do people really watch local news?
I'm 30 years old and I don't know anyone in my generation who watches cable news. I have a WaPo subscription and read news online, for the most part, it's WaPo, The Economist, 538 (Nate Silver), sometimes BBC, and then Bethesda Beat and Maryland Matters for local. I guess WAMU counts as a local station I'll selectively stream online.
But who actually watches broadcast cable networks? Do y'all have a landline too? A rotary phone? Are these the people voting for Joe Biden?
Anonymous wrote:Remarkably, Fox 5 news is not rw. They are a good local news station. They are very different than cable Fox News.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox 5 is fine.
Sinclair's WJLA 7 news is partisan junk. Sinclair makes local affiliates run segments of right wing disinformation and opinions. Here's a stunning montage of local news anchors reading Sinclair's statement all over the country -- clearly not their personal viewpoint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
I fail to see the scandal here? What’s wrong with journalists making a pledge of objectivity and promising to be free of bias?
Isn’t that sorta the point of journalism? Reporting the facts - JUST the facts - and letting people decide for themselves?
What’s wrong with that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t watch TV. Is this local channel considered apolitical/neutral?
Thanks
Are you seriously asking this? It’s a Fox channel, what do you think?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox 5 is fine.
Sinclair's WJLA 7 news is partisan junk. Sinclair makes local affiliates run segments of right wing disinformation and opinions. Here's a stunning montage of local news anchors reading Sinclair's statement all over the country -- clearly not their personal viewpoint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
I fail to see the scandal here? What’s wrong with journalists making a pledge of objectivity and promising to be free of bias?
Isn’t that sorta the point of journalism? Reporting the facts - JUST the facts - and letting people decide for themselves?
What’s wrong with that?
Anonymous wrote:Fox 5 is fine.
Sinclair's WJLA 7 news is partisan junk. Sinclair makes local affiliates run segments of right wing disinformation and opinions. Here's a stunning montage of local news anchors reading Sinclair's statement all over the country -- clearly not their personal viewpoint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
Anonymous wrote:Fox 5 is actually a delightful local news station - very similar to the small town news I came from. NBC4 seems super high budget, and that's fine too. I love Fox 5 because it doesn't switch over to national news at 7AM... it just keeps going with the same low budget, but very local news you need. It's my go to in a snow/traffic emergency. FWIW you ever get the chance, check out Fox 5 on Sunday morning - boy - it's like a high school news channel. They legit don't give AF. And it's awesome.