Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This girl really was born in 2003. Her biological mother is 40, having been born in 1979.
I can't believe her adoptive parents got away with child abuse and abandoment just because they're rich and can afford good lawyers.
Shame.
So she’s 20 now and still getting adopted?
you can adopt people until they're 21
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This girl really was born in 2003. Her biological mother is 40, having been born in 1979.
I can't believe her adoptive parents got away with child abuse and abandoment just because they're rich and can afford good lawyers.
Shame.
So she’s 20 now and still getting adopted?
Anonymous wrote:This girl really was born in 2003. Her biological mother is 40, having been born in 1979.
I can't believe her adoptive parents got away with child abuse and abandoment just because they're rich and can afford good lawyers.
Shame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.
The article states a second court ruling upheld her adult age. Definitely an adult who wishes to be cared for like a child. Hope she gets the mental health services she obviously needs.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so people can adopt from foreign countries and then somehow these poor kids become wards of our state? Or as the other thread calls them, public charges and in our system forever?
The adoptive parents should have to pay a fine, similar to people who start forest fires.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so people can adopt from foreign countries and then somehow these poor kids become wards of our state? Or as the other thread calls them, public charges and in our system forever?
The adoptive parents should have to pay a fine, similar to people who start forest fires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.
They were the second family. The very first adoption fell through, then the family with the autistic child adopted her. Then another family camr forward but backed oout at the last minute. This new family is the fourth (unless there were more).
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't that make her 17/18 today? Wouldn't she age out of the system?