Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
How can it be the best when they reserve 80% of the seats for CA residents? Any state university that reserves a certain number of seats for instate residents can’t automatically be the best as they are taking from students from a limited pool, rather than nationally.
Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I have lived in California. I would dispute that they are the best state universities for undergraduates. The UC System is extraordinarily focused on research and graduate programs.
That's true but also creates opportunities for undergrads. I went to a UC and was able to work in labs, TA an undergrad course, etc. My roommate was an avian science major, which seems obscure but there were too many avian science classes to take them all. I did have some huge lectures but most of my classes were under 30 people because there was the bandwidth to provide that.
It is definitely possible to get lost in the cracks and I knew many people who did. There was no academic or career counseling to speak of.
Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
They have moved to "holistic" admissions to get around that law. This de-emphasized just looking at things like standardized test scores. If Berkeley and UCLA just went by standardized test scores and class rank, they would be significantly more selective than other state schools in my view.
But note that other state schools do the same. There was a very recent study by a conservative think tank that showed that W&M and UVA have large gaps in standardized test scores between different racial groups.
I have lived in California. I would dispute that they are the best state universities for undergraduates. The UC System is extraordinarily focused on research and graduate programs.
California is still under prop 209 that prohibits race as a factor. Just check out how many African Americans it admits.
Anonymous wrote:I went to a Big 10 school many years ago. I went on a full-ride and had a decent education overall, but also the typical big school experience of huge biology and physics lectures, TAs or adjuncts teaching a good chunk of my classes, limited advising. I was very self-directed, so I was fine in that environment.
What makes flagship state schools like Michigan, UT and UVa rank so highly compared to others? I always assumed that any huge school (say, 20-50,000 students) would have the same pressures.
What are those higher-tier state schools doing differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
They have moved to "holistic" admissions to get around that law. This de-emphasized just looking at things like standardized test scores. If Berkeley and UCLA just went by standardized test scores and class rank, they would be significantly more selective than other state schools in my view.
But note that other state schools do the same. There was a very recent study by a conservative think tank that showed that W&M and UVA have large gaps in standardized test scores between different racial groups.
I have lived in California. I would dispute that they are the best state universities for undergraduates. The UC System is extraordinarily focused on research and graduate programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the academic quality of your peers differ as well? If your peers have 1100 SAT's vs. 1450 SAT's, you're probably going to notice a difference!
Yes if they are in the same class. But, most likely, they are not. Dumb kids will get weed out soon enough.
Anonymous wrote:Size and some other factors. UVA has always been well regarded but it took off with the huge growth rate of super smart people moving into nova. Their offspring often liked the flagship (or sometimes W&M). This really stated in the early 80s and it’s flat out crazy competitive now. Michigan and Madison have long served as the de facto state schools for New Jersey and NY, where lots of brilliant kids live, but the state options, outside of some parts of Cornell, are not that good. I have no idea why UNC ended up as a solid school.
Anonymous wrote:The best state universities are in California. California does not allow affirmative action by law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just remember that UVA is so much smaller than the big state u schools. It doesn't feel like those Big 10 schools with 60,000+ people on campus.
Enrollment is pushing 25K. Not Ohio State, but certainly not small. There are only about 10 private universities in the U.S. that are that large.
That’s with grad students. It’s small compared to OSU, Penn State, etc. it’s just not a good comparison.
Private schools aren’t really being discussed here.