Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to a gun store in Fairfax a few minutes ago and they are completely sold out of AR15s. I decided it was probably time to buy one while we can still get them, and they're already gone. The man at the store said there were people waiting in the parking lot when they opened this morning. He said one couple bought six, at a thousand dollars each.

What do you need an AR-15 for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are vile and violent, part a million

https://www.france24.com/en/20190913-republican-threatens-beto-o-rourke-over-gun-confiscation-pledge

A Republican lawmaker from Texas issued a barely veiled threat against Beto O'Rourke after the Democrat presidential hopeful said he would seize assault rifles behind many mass shootings in the country.

"My AR is ready for you, Robert Francis," Texas state legislator Briscoe Cain tweeted after O'Rourke's pledge in the Democratic presidential debate late Thursday, using O'Rourke's given name.

Asked in the debate if he is for confiscating assault weapons -- one of which was used to kill 22 people at a Walmart store in his home town of El Paso, Texas on August 3 -- O'Rourke replied:

"I am, if it's a weapon that was designed to kill people on the battlefield."

"When we see that being used against children... Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We're not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore."

After Cain's tweet, O'Rourke doubled down on his plan.

"This is a death threat, Representative. Clearly, you shouldn't own an AR-15?and neither should anyone else," he said on Twitter.

Well threatening to take private property and violate the bill of rights without due process is the definition of tyranny and is the very purpose the second amendment was meant to guard against.

Guns are regulateable. That's not tyranny. Sorry.

What is tyranny to one person is not to another, which is a reason we have things like laws and the constitution and don't govern by your feelings

You people are absolutely nuts

by the way:

that just shows you how irrational and drawn to sensationalism women are

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

He referred to Beto as "Robert Francis" as in an assasinated Kennedy. The FBI is investigating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are vile and violent, part a million

https://www.france24.com/en/20190913-republican-threatens-beto-o-rourke-over-gun-confiscation-pledge

A Republican lawmaker from Texas issued a barely veiled threat against Beto O'Rourke after the Democrat presidential hopeful said he would seize assault rifles behind many mass shootings in the country.

"My AR is ready for you, Robert Francis," Texas state legislator Briscoe Cain tweeted after O'Rourke's pledge in the Democratic presidential debate late Thursday, using O'Rourke's given name.

Asked in the debate if he is for confiscating assault weapons -- one of which was used to kill 22 people at a Walmart store in his home town of El Paso, Texas on August 3 -- O'Rourke replied:

"I am, if it's a weapon that was designed to kill people on the battlefield."

"When we see that being used against children... Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We're not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore."

After Cain's tweet, O'Rourke doubled down on his plan.

"This is a death threat, Representative. Clearly, you shouldn't own an AR-15?and neither should anyone else," he said on Twitter.

Well threatening to take private property and violate the bill of rights without due process is the definition of tyranny and is the very purpose the second amendment was meant to guard against.

Guns are regulateable. That's not tyranny. Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

He referred to Beto as "Robert Francis" as in an assasinated Kennedy. The FBI is investigating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Beto has zero right to go to this man’s house and take his weapon. If he tried to do so, he, Beto, would be shot or prosecuted.

Beto has no right or authority to enter anyone’s home and take ANYTHING.

He’s the criminal for threatening to take people’s guns.

True.

If he were president, though, Beto would have the right to offer legislation banning certain weapons and offering fair compensation to get human killing tools off the streets. It might not pass, but he could offer the legislation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Beto has zero right to go to this man’s house and take his weapon. If he tried to do so, he, Beto, would be shot or prosecuted.

Beto has no right or authority to enter anyone’s home and take ANYTHING.

He’s the criminal for threatening to take people’s guns.

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Anonymous wrote:I went to a gun store in Fairfax a few minutes ago and they are completely sold out of AR15s. I decided it was probably time to buy one while we can still get them, and they're already gone. The man at the store said there were people waiting in the parking lot when they opened this morning. He said one couple bought six, at a thousand dollars each.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are vile and violent, part a million

https://www.france24.com/en/20190913-republican-threatens-beto-o-rourke-over-gun-confiscation-pledge

A Republican lawmaker from Texas issued a barely veiled threat against Beto O'Rourke after the Democrat presidential hopeful said he would seize assault rifles behind many mass shootings in the country.

"My AR is ready for you, Robert Francis," Texas state legislator Briscoe Cain tweeted after O'Rourke's pledge in the Democratic presidential debate late Thursday, using O'Rourke's given name.

Asked in the debate if he is for confiscating assault weapons -- one of which was used to kill 22 people at a Walmart store in his home town of El Paso, Texas on August 3 -- O'Rourke replied:

"I am, if it's a weapon that was designed to kill people on the battlefield."

"When we see that being used against children... Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We're not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore."

After Cain's tweet, O'Rourke doubled down on his plan.

"This is a death threat, Representative. Clearly, you shouldn't own an AR-15?and neither should anyone else," he said on Twitter.

Well threatening to take private property and violate the bill of rights without due process is the definition of tyranny and is the very purpose the second amendment was meant to guard against.

Guns are regulateable. That's not tyranny. Sorry.

What is tyranny to one person is not to another, which is a reason we have things like laws and the constitution and don't govern by your feelings

You people are absolutely nuts

by the way:

that just shows you how irrational and drawn to sensationalism women are

Pot, kettle.

just making a reasonable inference based on facts

Anonymous wrote:Cold dead hands!