Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
There are 100+ hotels closer to the airport than Trump's failed property. This is outright theft, and the chain of commaned at the USAF needs to be brought to military justice on this. Shameful at every level.
So there are 100+ hotels they could’ve kept the crew in instead? That’s what you’re saying? All of which would’ve also required money being spent, in some cases perhaps more money, to put the crew up for the night.
So is your issue here the fact that money was spent to put the crew up in lodging? Or that it was spent at a Trump property? I can’t tell which just by your outrage. For all I know, like most Trump haters, you also hate the military and would tell them to just sleep in the cargo hold for the night. So it’s hard to pin down where your hate is focused.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe the Trump property offered a heavily discounted rate for the crew? Maybe it was cheaper than any similar hotel? Wouldn’t that make good fiscal sense?
Because if the rate was lower and the DoD paid more to stay somewhere else, I suspect you’d be complianing that Trump was being fiscally reckless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
This!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
This!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
There are 100+ hotels closer to the airport than Trump's failed property. This is outright theft, and the chain of commaned at the USAF needs to be brought to military justice on this. Shameful at every level.
So there are 100+ hotels they could’ve kept the crew in instead? That’s what you’re saying? All of which would’ve also required money being spent, in some cases perhaps more money, to put the crew up for the night.
So is your issue here the fact that money was spent to put the crew up in lodging? Or that it was spent at a Trump property? I can’t tell which just by your outrage. For all I know, like most Trump haters, you also hate the military and would tell them to just sleep in the cargo hold for the night. So it’s hard to pin down where your hate is focused.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe the Trump property offered a heavily discounted rate for the crew? Maybe it was cheaper than any similar hotel? Wouldn’t that make good fiscal sense?
Because if the rate was lower and the DoD paid more to stay somewhere else, I suspect you’d be complianing that Trump was being fiscally reckless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
There are 100+ hotels closer to the airport than Trump's failed property. This is outright theft, and the chain of commaned at the USAF needs to be brought to military justice on this. Shameful at every level.
So there are 100+ hotels they could’ve kept the crew in instead? That’s what you’re saying? All of which would’ve also required money being spent, in some cases perhaps more money, to put the crew up for the night.
So is your issue here the fact that money was spent to put the crew up in lodging? Or that it was spent at a Trump property? I can’t tell which just by your outrage. For all I know, like most Trump haters, you also hate the military and would tell them to just sleep in the cargo hold for the night. So it’s hard to pin down where your hate is focused.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe the Trump property offered a heavily discounted rate for the crew? Maybe it was cheaper than any similar hotel? Wouldn’t that make good fiscal sense?
Because if the rate was lower and the DoD paid more to stay somewhere else, I suspect you’d be complianing that Trump was being fiscally reckless.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds as though you are claiming the airmen resented this? I don't know about you but, I stay in plenty of hotels I'd prefer not to eat in. This doesn't sound like the case here though. I'm finicky and would prefer an amazing mattress, night thread count sheets and fantastic pillows over a meal any day. I shouldn't speak for them though. Interesting others are speaking for them though. Oh well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
There are 100+ hotels closer to the airport than Trump's failed property. This is outright theft, and the chain of commaned at the USAF needs to be brought to military justice on this. Shameful at every level.
So there are 100+ hotels they could’ve kept the crew in instead? That’s what you’re saying? All of which would’ve also required money being spent, in some cases perhaps more money, to put the crew up for the night.
So is your issue here the fact that money was spent to put the crew up in lodging? Or that it was spent at a Trump property? I can’t tell which just by your outrage. For all I know, like most Trump haters, you also hate the military and would tell them to just sleep in the cargo hold for the night. So it’s hard to pin down where your hate is focused.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe the Trump property offered a heavily discounted rate for the crew? Maybe it was cheaper than any similar hotel? Wouldn’t that make good fiscal sense?
Because if the rate was lower and the DoD paid more to stay somewhere else, I suspect you’d be complianing that Trump was being fiscally reckless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
There are 100+ hotels closer to the airport than Trump's failed property. This is outright theft, and the chain of commaned at the USAF needs to be brought to military justice on this. Shameful at every level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a clear cut violation of the Constitution.
+1
How can anyone defend this obvious abuse of power?
Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
Anonymous wrote:I’m sure that aircrew was appreciative of a little downtime at such a nice place.
Globemasters aren’t like flying commercial. They’re slower, wayyyyyy louder inside, and generally are about as comfortable as riding on a wood bench in the back of a moving truck. I’d be thrilled at the prospect of a sauna dip and a comfy bed after 6,000 miles on a C17.
Good for Trump for thinking of those Airmen’s comfort. That’s class.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds as though you are claiming the airmen resented this? I don't know about you but, I stay in plenty of hotels I'd prefer not to eat in. This doesn't sound like the case here though. I'm finicky and would prefer an amazing mattress, night thread count sheets and fantastic pillows over a meal any day. I shouldn't speak for them though. Interesting others are speaking for them though. Oh well.
Anonymous wrote:This is a clear cut violation of the Constitution.