Anonymous wrote:Pipeline was never the top club, just stop.
Anonymous wrote:I love these threads. Seeing parent argue so vigorously about 14 year old girls soccer is quite a treat. Such myopia about where their daughters really stand in the whole US soccers pyramid.
Carry on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
I’d take Celtic and Loudoun by a hair over MU. All very close. SAC is pretty good too. Good D. Don’t score much but hard to score on.
I think MU 05 may be better than people are giving them credit for.
Is Pipeline 05 better than Baltimore Armour 05? If so, why?
No chance IMO.
Pipeline is 2? No VDA? Arlington over MU? Wow.
Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
I’d take Celtic and Loudoun by a hair over MU. All very close. SAC is pretty good too. Good D. Don’t score much but hard to score on.
I think MU 05 may be better than people are giving them credit for.
Is Pipeline 05 better than Baltimore Armour 05? If so, why?
No chance IMO.
Pipeline is 2? No VDA? Arlington over MU? Wow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
I’d take Celtic and Loudoun by a hair over MU. All very close. SAC is pretty good too. Good D. Don’t score much but hard to score on.
I think MU 05 may be better than people are giving them credit for.
Is Pipeline 05 better than Baltimore Armour 05? If so, why?
No chance IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
I’d take Celtic and Loudoun by a hair over MU. All very close. SAC is pretty good too. Good D. Don’t score much but hard to score on.
I think MU 05 may be better than people are giving them credit for.
Is Pipeline 05 better than Baltimore Armour 05? If so, why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
I’d take Celtic and Loudoun by a hair over MU. All very close. SAC is pretty good too. Good D. Don’t score much but hard to score on.
Anonymous wrote:1. FCV
2. Pipeline
3. Bethesda ECNL (2.0)
4. McLean ECNL
5. Arlington DA
6. MU
7. Baltimore Celtic
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VDA was NOT dropped by DA (other way around) Don't start that BS. In fact, they were the only club in the area they had Both Girls and Boys DA.
VDA left after winning 6 games across all girls age groups in the DA.
You sound stupid
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VDA was NOT dropped by DA (other way around) Don't start that BS. In fact, they were the only club in the area they had Both Girls and Boys DA.
VDA left after winning 6 games across all girls age groups in the DA.