Anonymous wrote:Start brown nosing the powers that be.
Anonymous wrote:In addition to NNAT parents can submit a request on a rolling basis to be reviewed by the G&T team. My son was identified in first grade. He does receive special instruction in math (now in 4th) which I think is good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If APS isn’t providing actual gifted services, why test them in 2nd and 4th? (Sincere question)
They are providing gifted services. Dd did deep dives into a couple of classic books with her school’s gifted resource teacher last year. Most materials are designed to not look much different from general classroom materials, and the way services are delivered in general are designed to blend in rather than stand out. For that reason parents see very little of services offered, and the kids themselves may not realize that they are doing more challenging work than some others in the classroom.
For those interested in the gifted services offered at your kid’s school, I would encourage you to attend a gifted services presentation if offered by your school, because if your kid is offered services you probably won’t gain clarity any other way. My kids have attended 2 different APS elementary schools, and one had a gifted services teacher who was really good about showing and explaining what they do (at a presentation) and another who was standoffish and not forthcoming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t worry about it as gifted programming in Arlington isn’t particularly... exceptional. He will either be identified or not, but it won’t really affect his education one way or another (although maybe your ego might be temporarily buoyed.)
This.
Also, some schools identify a full 30% which is statistically not possible. It's not hard to get identified, you don't have to push for anything b/c there is nothing to get. Maybe an extra math worksheet; maybe a game every now and then. And a tweet; probably a tweet.
One thing that is misleading about this statistic is that it implies "gifted"(for services purposes) is a a yes/no thing. Students are evaluated for math, reading/writing, social studies and science independently, and only get services in the subjects for which they are identified. So assuming your 30% statistic is accurate (I've not seen it anywhere), that doesn't mean 30% of students are getting services in all subjects.
The gifted ID rate at each school is in the APS budget. Each school has a budget page. It shows total student population and gifted ID-ed kids (and many other things). Look at some of the N ARL schools. Do the math, the ID rate is 30%.
https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FY-2020-School-Board-Adopted-Budget-Book_Final-for-Web.pdf
I think the PPs point is that a person could be receiving gifted services in just one category... math and not science, for instance. Or arts and not academics. So yes the ID rate is 30% but it's not necessarily that all 30% of the students are IDed as gifted across all subjects.
Anonymous wrote:If APS isn’t providing actual gifted services, why test them in 2nd and 4th? (Sincere question)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t worry about it as gifted programming in Arlington isn’t particularly... exceptional. He will either be identified or not, but it won’t really affect his education one way or another (although maybe your ego might be temporarily buoyed.)
This.
Also, some schools identify a full 30% which is statistically not possible. It's not hard to get identified, you don't have to push for anything b/c there is nothing to get. Maybe an extra math worksheet; maybe a game every now and then. And a tweet; probably a tweet.
One thing that is misleading about this statistic is that it implies "gifted"(for services purposes) is a a yes/no thing. Students are evaluated for math, reading/writing, social studies and science independently, and only get services in the subjects for which they are identified. So assuming your 30% statistic is accurate (I've not seen it anywhere), that doesn't mean 30% of students are getting services in all subjects.
The gifted ID rate at each school is in the APS budget. Each school has a budget page. It shows total student population and gifted ID-ed kids (and many other things). Look at some of the N ARL schools. Do the math, the ID rate is 30%.
https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FY-2020-School-Board-Adopted-Budget-Book_Final-for-Web.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t worry about it as gifted programming in Arlington isn’t particularly... exceptional. He will either be identified or not, but it won’t really affect his education one way or another (although maybe your ego might be temporarily buoyed.)
This.
Also, some schools identify a full 30% which is statistically not possible. It's not hard to get identified, you don't have to push for anything b/c there is nothing to get. Maybe an extra math worksheet; maybe a game every now and then. And a tweet; probably a tweet.
One thing that is misleading about this statistic is that it implies "gifted"(for services purposes) is a a yes/no thing. Students are evaluated for math, reading/writing, social studies and science independently, and only get services in the subjects for which they are identified. So assuming your 30% statistic is accurate (I've not seen it anywhere), that doesn't mean 30% of students are getting services in all subjects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t worry about it as gifted programming in Arlington isn’t particularly... exceptional. He will either be identified or not, but it won’t really affect his education one way or another (although maybe your ego might be temporarily buoyed.)
This.
Also, some schools identify a full 30% which is statistically not possible. It's not hard to get identified, you don't have to push for anything b/c there is nothing to get. Maybe an extra math worksheet; maybe a game every now and then. And a tweet; probably a tweet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t worry about it as gifted programming in Arlington isn’t particularly... exceptional. He will either be identified or not, but it won’t really affect his education one way or another (although maybe your ego might be temporarily buoyed.)
This.
Also, some schools identify a full 30% which is statistically not possible. It's not hard to get identified, you don't have to push for anything b/c there is nothing to get. Maybe an extra math worksheet; maybe a game every now and then. And a tweet; probably a tweet.
Anonymous wrote:PP here: I am talking about elementary...not above that.