Anonymous wrote:The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland in WWII is because it would have been a nightmare for them to even try, given how armed Swiss citizens were (and are).
God , you ammosexuals are imbelic. So dumb, so uniformed... The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland was because they wanted a neutral place (i.e., that the Allies would stay out of) that they could secretly store gold and, more importantly, have a place Nazi leaders could slip away to, if the war turned against them.
But the funniest/dumbest thing you say iswould have been a nightmare for them to even try
The Nazis lost more than 3.5 million men (that's more than 8 times the total losses of the U.S. in WWII) on the Eastern Front alone. That's one campaign and does include their combat with the Americans, British and Canadians. So, um... they weren't worried about those pesky Swiss and the "nightmare" rolling through Switzerland would have (not) presented.
You are an idiot .
When's the next mass shooting? NRA4Ever! Keep Voting Republican!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The far right pro-gun camp insists that they must defend their right to stockpile multiple and highly lethal firearms in the event that they must rise up against a tyrannical government.
As such, can anyone provide an example of a nation, in the distant or recent past, that has drawn on their legal right to own guns to successfully defeat a tyrannical government and install a new, highly functioning democracy?
Usually I like to think that laws are based at least in part on best practices and lessons learned analyses, so just curious if there are any examples we can draw insights from.
The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland in WWII is because it would have been a nightmare for them to even try, given how armed Swiss citizens were (and are).
Compare that with what happened to Austria.
Anonymous wrote:USA 1946 - Battle of Athens.
Anyway a better question is... what dictatorial regime didn’t first disarm the citizenry before imposing murderous totalitarianism?
The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland in WWII is because it would have been a nightmare for them to even try, given how armed Swiss citizens were (and are).
The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland in WWII is because it would have been a nightmare for them to even try, given how armed Swiss citizens were (and are).
would have been a nightmare for them to even try
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The United States
It’s OWN government, not colonial rule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USA 1946 - Battle of Athens.
Anyway a better question is... what dictatorial regime didn’t first disarm the citizenry before imposing murderous totalitarianism?
There is nothing stopping the us from doing that. We no longer have well regulated militias.
My hunch is if ‘goverenment’ started going door to door to rounding up firearms, we’d have some well regulated militias form up rather quick.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The far right pro-gun camp insists that they must defend their right to stockpile multiple and highly lethal firearms in the event that they must rise up against a tyrannical government.
As such, can anyone provide an example of a nation, in the distant or recent past, that has drawn on their legal right to own guns to successfully defeat a tyrannical government and install a new, highly functioning democracy?
Usually I like to think that laws are based at least in part on best practices and lessons learned analyses, so just curious if there are any examples we can draw insights from.
The reason the Nazis didn't invade Switzerland in WWII is because it would have been a nightmare for them to even try, given how armed Swiss citizens were (and are).
Compare that with what happened to Austria.
Anonymous wrote:Russia 1917 and the overthrow of Nicholas and Alexandra
Anonymous wrote:We don’t still have the 2A to keep the government in check. That’s a joke.
We still have the 2A because it’s profitable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USA 1946 - Battle of Athens.
Anyway a better question is... what dictatorial regime didn’t first disarm the citizenry before imposing murderous totalitarianism?
There is nothing stopping the us from doing that. We no longer have well regulated militias.
Anonymous wrote:The far right pro-gun camp insists that they must defend their right to stockpile multiple and highly lethal firearms in the event that they must rise up against a tyrannical government.
As such, can anyone provide an example of a nation, in the distant or recent past, that has drawn on their legal right to own guns to successfully defeat a tyrannical government and install a new, highly functioning democracy?
Usually I like to think that laws are based at least in part on best practices and lessons learned analyses, so just curious if there are any examples we can draw insights from.