Anonymous wrote:
Not always but usually, 4 comes after 3. Not another 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s expanding. I saw a panhandler at shady grove and crabbs branch. How much worse is this going to get ?
Please explain what, specifically, is bad about this for you, sitting in your climate-controlled car at an intersection?
I don't want to look at them. That's what you're looking for, right? Besides being unsightly, panhandling on the median is dangerous for the person doing it as well as for drivers.
They hold up traffic, too.
So
1. You don't want to look at them.
2. You might run them over with your car.
3. Sometimes they add a few seconds to the length of your trip.
3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s expanding. I saw a panhandler at shady grove and crabbs branch. How much worse is this going to get ?
Please explain what, specifically, is bad about this for you, sitting in your climate-controlled car at an intersection?
I don't want to look at them. That's what you're looking for, right? Besides being unsightly, panhandling on the median is dangerous for the person doing it as well as for drivers.
They hold up traffic, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s expanding. I saw a panhandler at shady grove and crabbs branch. How much worse is this going to get ?
Please explain what, specifically, is bad about this for you, sitting in your climate-controlled car at an intersection?
I don't want to look at them. That's what you're looking for, right? Besides being unsightly, panhandling on the median is dangerous for the person doing it as well as for drivers.