Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

They are differences between the two schools' IB programs. The applicant would have to decide if it is worth it to them or not. suspect and crazy??

Yes, but what is the relevance of the IB diploma rates?

Some schools have IB programs with 95% diploma rates and some schools have 6% diploma rates. Which would you choose if your child hoped to finish with the diploma? Certainly worth looking at before deciding.

Because those stats definitely mean the same kid would be 10x more likely to get a diploma at one than the other.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

They are differences between the two schools' IB programs. The applicant would have to decide if it is worth it to them or not. suspect and crazy??

Yes, but what is the relevance of the IB diploma rates?

Some schools have IB programs with 95% diploma rates and some schools have 6% diploma rates. Which would you choose if your child hoped to finish with the diploma? Certainly worth looking at before deciding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

IBO's philosophy centers on open enrollment. Test-in options, like those used by RM, go against the philosophy. However, in order to recruit the "best and brightest," RM is highly selective in its recruitment.

IBDP at Springbrook, for example, is opt in. If a kid shows initiative but lacks certain skills, the EOS contract includes methods for increasing enrollment in upper level classes WHILE focusing on skill-building. So a student in RM may earn higher scores on internal and external exams b/c of the vetting. Scores in op-in schools tend to be lower b/c of the open philosophy and scaffolding needs.

I viewed that board doc and my head was spinning. Even within schools, there are competing programs, which I think is ridiculous.

So instead of remediation - or catching them early on - the county just throws in another program, hoping that this band aid approach will mask this issues.

Kids from supportive homes - regardless of SES - will do well b/c of the expectations set for them and the structures in place at home to ensure they're learning. A program expansion isn't going to close the gap, nor is an open-enrollment policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

They are differences between the two schools' IB programs. The applicant would have to decide if it is worth it to them or not. suspect and crazy??

Yes, but what is the relevance of the IB diploma rates?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

Kia is a car, Ferrari is a car...

Camry vs Lexus, the only difference is the logo,

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

A lot of families do this from all over the county. If you think it’s crazy, you don’t have to do it. Others see value, you don’t. And that’s okay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

They are differences between the two schools' IB programs. The applicant would have to decide if it is worth it to them or not. suspect and crazy??

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

Kia is a car, Ferrari is a car...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

I don't understand the point of this post.

Are you suggesting that it is worth it for someone who is in inbounds for BCC to commute to RM so they can have their classes with just IB-DP kids (who live all over the county)?

Are you suggesting that kid is more likely to end up with an IB diploma if they go to RM than BCC?

Both of those statements fall somewhere between suspect and crazy to me, but it is DCUM....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS will start to use “Cohort”to reject qualified students next year. Students from Churchill and Wooton HS clusters will see greatly reduced chance to get into the Magnets but Kennedy, Northwood or other HSs will see more students attending Blair or RM Magnet. Each school may send 5-10 students.

Without the strong magnet what is Blair? A GS4 maybe ... a 3?

SInce MCPS has not announced changes to SMAC or CAP we do not need to think about that at this point.

Anonymous wrote:There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

RM has the two year magnet in 9th and 10th with only kids who were accepted to the application program. They have all of their classes (aside from PE and an maybe and elective) with the smaller group of peers. Also compare the diploma rates of the two programs if that is important to you.

There is no point in applying to RM IB if you are Inbounds for BCC. Having said that I am sure someone wil contradict me

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS will start to use “Cohort”to reject qualified students next year. Students from Churchill and Wooton HS clusters will see greatly reduced chance to get into the Magnets but Kennedy, Northwood or other HSs will see more students attending Blair or RM Magnet. Each school may send 5-10 students.

Without the strong magnet what is Blair? A GS4 maybe ... a 3?

That was less a dog whistle than an air raid siren.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS will start to use “Cohort”to reject qualified students next year. Students from Churchill and Wooton HS clusters will see greatly reduced chance to get into the Magnets but Kennedy, Northwood or other HSs will see more students attending Blair or RM Magnet. Each school may send 5-10 students.

Has this actually been stated?

No. Read this memo to see what has actually been stated.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BCDLPL55BB9C/$file/Choice%20Update%20HS%20Prog%20Options%20190530.pdf

This is really helpful. Where will the new IB programs be?

Watkins Mill, Kennedy, and Springbrook

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS will start to use “Cohort”to reject qualified students next year. Students from Churchill and Wooton HS clusters will see greatly reduced chance to get into the Magnets but Kennedy, Northwood or other HSs will see more students attending Blair or RM Magnet. Each school may send 5-10 students.

Has this actually been stated?

No. Read this memo to see what has actually been stated.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BCDLPL55BB9C/$file/Choice%20Update%20HS%20Prog%20Options%20190530.pdf

This is really helpful. Where will the new IB programs be?