Anonymous wrote:I was the original "different strokes" and I stand by it. There are some posters here who LOVE to act as if the royal children are far and away the best looking kids. In my opinion it's not true. None of the children in the British royal family are anything beyond cute (I'm a huge MM fan and the "Archie is Gorgeous" was just as ridiculous) and neither are these girls.

There are children that make you stop in public and comment on their looks; that's my criteria for "beautiful/gorgeous". Would you honestly do a double take at these girls if you didn't know who they were? I highly doubt it.

Truly. That’s why some people have their tongues so far up these people’s asses. They don’t deserve democracy, they’d rather be ruled by inbreds. But they’re “so lovely”, so it’s all ok.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm more interested in talking about their mother's royal nose job and lip fillers.

She has improved drastically. This is what good plastic surgery looks like. I am a huge fan.

The woman in the second set of picturs look like completely different people.

I was the original "different strokes" and I stand by it. There are some posters here who LOVE to act as if the royal children are far and away the best looking kids. In my opinion it's not true. None of the children in the British royal family are anything beyond cute (I'm a huge MM fan and the "Archie is Gorgeous" was just as ridiculous) and neither are these girls.

There are children that make you stop in public and comment on their looks; that's my criteria for "beautiful/gorgeous". Would you honestly do a double take at these girls if you didn't know who they were? I highly doubt it.

Anonymous wrote:People spend a lot of time talking about how gorgeous Kate/Meghan are and how cute the kids are (and they are) but *this* is what I think of when I think of "Royal Family." Everyone thinks their kids are the cutest but these are some seriously striking children (and parents).

Interesting that they come to America for camp. I wonder if they are going to the same place that the Obama girls went to.

https://us.hola.com/royals/2019062725266/princess-leonor-sofia-spain-us-summer-camp/

Dp. They are cute, but wouldn't say gorgeous.

Anonymous wrote:If someone can't find the Spanish princesses lovely then it frightens me to consider what they think must constitute beautiful.

The girls are lovely. True, they have the benefit of health, diet, grooming and deportment, but they are well put together and that really is all that matters at the end of the day. Anything beyond that is merely subjective.

Are you always this dramatic?

If someone can't find the Spanish princesses lovely then it frightens me to consider what they think must constitute beautiful.

The girls are lovely. True, they have the benefit of health, diet, grooming and deportment, but they are well put together and that really is all that matters at the end of the day. Anything beyond that is merely subjective.

She looks amazing but she doesn’t even look like the same person. I’m disappointed. I thought she was naturally that pretty.

Anonymous wrote:I'm more interested in talking about their mother's royal nose job and lip fillers.

She has improved drastically. This is what good plastic surgery looks like. I am a huge fan.

Anonymous wrote:I'm more interested in talking about their mother's royal nose job and lip fillers.

It’s a definite improvement.

Anonymous wrote:This forum is obsessed with saying everyone looks average except for their children of course. Those are, objectively, two good-looking children. They are also extremely well-behaved, composed, and put-together and always have been. I'm a pretty avid royal watcher and these two seem to have had a good upbringing.

Look you can think they are good looking but, you need to accept that not everyone is going to feel the same way. I would argue, they are objectively average looking. Oh and I don’t have kids, I’m a nanny who has nannied for kids who look like them. I see kids that look like them at the zoo, playground, museums and library.

I'm more interested in talking about their mother's royal nose job and lip fillers.

Anonymous wrote:Different strokes for different folks I guess. I don’t find them to be “beautiful” at all. They are pretty girls but I’ve seen prettier girls at random DC parks.

Agree. They have their hair combed and they got some cool dresses on and they have deportment. Average looking to me, maybe slightly above average, especially with the polish.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder where the camp is they go to in the US

If I had to guess, Wicosuta.

This forum is obsessed with saying everyone looks average except for their children of course. Those are, objectively, two good-looking children. They are also extremely well-behaved, composed, and put-together and always have been. I'm a pretty avid royal watcher and these two seem to have had a good upbringing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Different strokes for different folks I guess. I don’t find them to be “beautiful” at all. They are pretty girls but I’ve seen prettier girls at random DC parks.

Ok? What does this have to do with anything?

PP thinks only her DD is a real "princess."