Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The median price of a house in the DC metro region is 475,00. If two members of a household are GS 13s (and chances are one would go higher at least eventually) then they might have a 190,000 income.
That fed famly might pay 2400 PITI for that median home.
The "DC metro area" extends as far as West Virginia, but realistically, the only areas that matter when we're talking about affordability are those that are within a reasonable commuting distance (less than an hour) from downtown DC.
I'm a single government employee looking to purchase a condo. It's very difficult to find a one-bedroom condo in DC that is $2400 all-in. A typical listing is $500k plus monthly condo fees of $500+. Let's not talk about two bedrooms or even one bedroom + den. I'm looking at monthly expenses of $3000+, which is a loooooong stretch on my $100k salary.
Using your $190,000 example and typical affordability guidelines, that dual income GS-13 couple should not spend more than 3-4x their income, or $760k for a home.
The run-down 2br/1ba row houses in NE/SE that sold for $300k ten years ago are now having bidding wars at $760k. Out of reach for a single government employee, and not quite large enough for a family. But there are plenty of flippers and high-earning, non-fed DINKs who continue to push those prices higher and higher.
I also think that people who purchased during 2008-2015 have NO idea how wacky things have become. When I tell my coworkers that I pay $2500 for rent on a one-bedroom apartment, they laugh at me for wasting money and say that their mortgage on their 3br SFH in Falls Church is less than that. Good luck finding anything even remotely close to that in the same neighborhoods in 2019.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly IMO -- the effect will be almost negligible.
The majority of federal jobs being moved are middle management and paper pushers for satellite offices.
So yes - USDA is heading to Kansas/Missouri, 3.5K of FBI is moving to Alabama, and BLM is moving...somewhere. But DoD is going nowhere, the majority of high security contractors are staying here and the lobbyists and tech developers (the real moneymakers) are growing.
I will happily take the 30,000 Amazon employees, 1,000 Google employees, and a couple hundred Facebook employees, and all of the New York millionaires moving down here in exchange for the loss of 4,000 or so feds moving to the middle of the country. Not to mention the relocation of Virginia Tech's campus and John Hopkins.
D.C. is booming.
Oh goodness. Johns Hopkins is not relocating.
A $400 million investment in a new campus says something else. But yes, they are staying on their main campus under armed militia guard for the foreseeable future.
“We have wanted to bring all of our activities together into one facility and also have increasingly wanted to be able to bring some of our programs and research activities that are currently in Baltimore and elsewhere to Washington,” Daniels said. “We are hoping that with this new facility we’ll be able to offer more opportunities for undergraduates to do, for instance, internships and policy-related seminars and other activities in Washington. This becomes a wonderful portal for us to bring undergraduate and graduate students who are currently in Baltimore to Washington for relatively discrete periods of time.”
- Hopkins President Ronald J. Daniels
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly IMO -- the effect will be almost negligible.
The majority of federal jobs being moved are middle management and paper pushers for satellite offices.
So yes - USDA is heading to Kansas/Missouri, 3.5K of FBI is moving to Alabama, and BLM is moving...somewhere. But DoD is going nowhere, the majority of high security contractors are staying here and the lobbyists and tech developers (the real moneymakers) are growing.
I will happily take the 30,000 Amazon employees, 1,000 Google employees, and a couple hundred Facebook employees, and all of the New York millionaires moving down here in exchange for the loss of 4,000 or so feds moving to the middle of the country. Not to mention the relocation of Virginia Tech's campus and John Hopkins.
D.C. is booming.
Oh goodness. Johns Hopkins is not relocating.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly IMO -- the effect will be almost negligible.
The majority of federal jobs being moved are middle management and paper pushers for satellite offices.
So yes - USDA is heading to Kansas/Missouri, 3.5K of FBI is moving to Alabama, and BLM is moving...somewhere. But DoD is going nowhere, the majority of high security contractors are staying here and the lobbyists and tech developers (the real moneymakers) are growing.
I will happily take the 30,000 Amazon employees, 1,000 Google employees, and a couple hundred Facebook employees, and all of the New York millionaires moving down here in exchange for the loss of 4,000 or so feds moving to the middle of the country. Not to mention the relocation of Virginia Tech's campus and John Hopkins.
D.C. is booming.
Anonymous wrote:The typical GS-13 can no longer afford to buy a home in the DC area.
Anonymous wrote:The typical GS-13 can no longer afford to buy a home in the DC area. Losing those jobs will have zero effect on the local housing market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The median price of a house in the DC metro region is 475,00. If two members of a household are GS 13s (and chances are one would go higher at least eventually) then they might have a 190,000 income.
That fed famly might pay 2400 PITI for that median home.
The "DC metro area" extends as far as West Virginia, but realistically, the only areas that matter when we're talking about affordability are those that are within a reasonable commuting distance (less than an hour) from downtown DC.
I'm a single government employee looking to purchase a condo. It's very difficult to find a one-bedroom condo in DC that is $2400 all-in. A typical listing is $500k plus monthly condo fees of $500+. Let's not talk about two bedrooms or even one bedroom + den. I'm looking at monthly expenses of $3000+, which is a loooooong stretch on my $100k salary.
Using your $190,000 example and typical affordability guidelines, that dual income GS-13 couple should not spend more than 3-4x their income, or $760k for a home.
The run-down 2br/1ba row houses in NE/SE that sold for $300k ten years ago are now having bidding wars at $760k. Out of reach for a single government employee, and not quite large enough for a family. But there are plenty of flippers and high-earning, non-fed DINKs who continue to push those prices higher and higher.
I also think that people who purchased during 2008-2015 have NO idea how wacky things have become. When I tell my coworkers that I pay $2500 for rent on a one-bedroom apartment, they laugh at me for wasting money and say that their mortgage on their 3br SFH in Falls Church is less than that. Good luck finding anything even remotely close to that in the same neighborhoods in 2019.
Anonymous wrote:The median price of a house in the DC metro region is 475,00. If two members of a household are GS 13s (and chances are one would go higher at least eventually) then they might have a 190,000 income.
That fed famly might pay 2400 PITI for that median home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which means more tourism revenue for DC. Bottom line - it’s good for us regardless.
Good news is good news and bad news is good news! This poster should be President of the National Realtors Association.
Just realistic PP. I've had friends begging for a downturn/bubble since 2011. Guess what -- we're in another year of record growth and they're still priced out.
Trying to turn so-so news of a few federal middle-class households who live in Chantilly anyway being forced to move out of the region into some big thing for the entirety of a crazy metro real estate market is foolish.
Greater Washington jumped to second nationally for construction starts in 2018
https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2019/02/15/greater-washington-jumped-to-second-nationally-for.html
The 50 States of Construction: DC's building boom driven by more than the government
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/the-50-states-of-construction-dcs-building-boom-driven-by-more-than-the-g/436587/
Amazon’s Virginia HQ2 Is Causing a Real Estate Boom
https://observer.com/2019/05/amazon-virginia-hq2-real-estate-boom/
you are just proving his point further
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which means more tourism revenue for DC. Bottom line - it’s good for us regardless.
Good news is good news and bad news is good news! This poster should be President of the National Realtors Association.
Just realistic PP. I've had friends begging for a downturn/bubble since 2011. Guess what -- we're in another year of record growth and they're still priced out.
Trying to turn so-so news of a few federal middle-class households who live in Chantilly anyway being forced to move out of the region into some big thing for the entirety of a crazy metro real estate market is foolish.
Greater Washington jumped to second nationally for construction starts in 2018
https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2019/02/15/greater-washington-jumped-to-second-nationally-for.html
The 50 States of Construction: DC's building boom driven by more than the government
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/the-50-states-of-construction-dcs-building-boom-driven-by-more-than-the-g/436587/
Amazon’s Virginia HQ2 Is Causing a Real Estate Boom
https://observer.com/2019/05/amazon-virginia-hq2-real-estate-boom/