Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
More importantly it places our ICE personnel in danger because they have lost the element of surprise. Why did the administration publicly announce the timing?
Red meat for the base.
Is there any solution between the "Red Meat For The Base Crowd" and "Virtue Signal For Open Borders Crowd"?
It's too bad be don't have a Congress that could deal this.
For those who claim illegal immigrants grow the economy, please explain why one DMV county's economic growth has flatlined as the tax cuts for Democratic contributors has increased? Asking for a friend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
More importantly it places our ICE personnel in danger because they have lost the element of surprise. Why did the administration publicly announce the timing?
Red meat for the base.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My solution would be that:
1) Anyone who is caught crossing into this country illegally cannot then claim asylum as a "backup." Out you go.
2) Anyone who is not carrying proof of asylum (persecution based on religion or politics) and is depending simply on a story, out you go.
3) We charge a $100 fee to process asylum claims, which would be returned if asylum is granted. (And don't tell me these people don't have $100. I see cell phones and expensive sneakers galore, and they came up with thousand of dollars to pay coyotes.)
4) We de-incentivize illegal immigration by a) charging a transaction fee of 50% to all money sent from the U.S. to Central American countries unless the person can prove citizenship, and b) stop promising more freebies to illegal aliens.
Why penalize those from Central American countries. If you charge a transaction fee it should be to all countries. Your racism is abundantly apparently with your need to treat Central Americans different from illegal immigrants from Ireland, Russia, or Nigeria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
More importantly it places our ICE personnel in danger because they have lost the element of surprise. Why did the administration publicly announce the timing?
Red meat for the base.
Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a moderate Democrat and it is ridiculous there is an uproar about deporting people who ALREADY went through the asylum process and were ordered to leave.
Thank you Democratic Party for shooting yourself in both feet. Trump 2020 looks like a sure thing.
Anonymous wrote:My solution would be that:
1) Anyone who is caught crossing into this country illegally cannot then claim asylum as a "backup." Out you go.
2) Anyone who is not carrying proof of asylum (persecution based on religion or politics) and is depending simply on a story, out you go.
3) We charge a $100 fee to process asylum claims, which would be returned if asylum is granted. (And don't tell me these people don't have $100. I see cell phones and expensive sneakers galore, and they came up with thousand of dollars to pay coyotes.)
4) We de-incentivize illegal immigration by a) charging a transaction fee of 50% to all money sent from the U.S. to Central American countries unless the person can prove citizenship, and b) stop promising more freebies to illegal aliens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
More importantly it places our ICE personnel in danger because they have lost the element of surprise. Why did the administration publicly announce the timing?
Because Trump wants there to be violence.
Anonymous wrote:OP - I doubt you will get any reasonable responses from liberals because there really is no reasonable solution that doesn't include detention and deportation.
A whole lot of virtue signaling going on with the liberals these days.
Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
So why are the raids being publicized days in advance?
“It’s unprecedented. But there is a political purpose behind it,” Thomas Kilbride, a retired Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agent and ICE policy adviser, told Fox News. He said the president has tried to get Democrats to come to the table because asylum laws need to change, and this is a way to bargain.
Other experts have underscored that Trump’s announcements are something of a gesture – and not something that the administration was under any legal obligation to do.
“The main point here is that the Trump administration is trying to circumvent some of the blowback from the other side of the aisle. It sends the message that these people have been notified to self-deport and if they fail to do that, this might happen,” said Steve Bucci, homeland security expert at the Heritage Foundation. “It is saying that we aren’t monsters, what we are doing is in accordance with the law and in a reasonable fashion.
"Past administrations didn’t announce raids because they didn’t have to, they just did them.”
Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a moderate Democrat and it is ridiculous there is an uproar about deporting people who ALREADY went through the asylum process and were ordered to leave.
Thank you Democratic Party for shooting yourself in both feet. Trump 2020 looks like a sure thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
More importantly it places our ICE personnel in danger because they have lost the element of surprise. Why did the administration publicly announce the timing?
Anonymous wrote: Announcing there is a raid coming sort of defeats the point though, doesn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a moderate Democrat and it is ridiculous there is an uproar about deporting people who ALREADY went through the asylum process and were ordered to leave.
Thank you Democratic Party for shooting yourself in both feet. Trump 2020 looks like a sure thing.