Anonymous wrote:^^ OOPs, my post was embedded. Meant to ask — why would she lie?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t given a chance to buy it back. She offered to buy it back and they refused, they would only let her get it back if she signed a new contract with them, and then would give her one album back for each new one she created for them.
That is her side of the story. I don’t know the truth either but if her father, who she has a close relationship with, approved the sale, I tend to think she was given the rights to buy her music back.
I agree she is way too old for this childish social media tantrum.
Where are you seeing that her father approved the sale? I can’t find that reported anywhere.
+1. I read that they didn’t tell her father about the sale because they didn’t to take the chance that he would tell Taylor.
Why would she (so blatantly and publicly) lie about this?
Not true. And this I know for a fact. Her father and the former owner both told Taylor about the sale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's got my sympathy. FWIW
Not mine.
She is a petulant child and has been since she came out. She cannot sing or dance. I will give it to her that she can write a catchy song but nothing memorable.
Anonymous wrote:She's got my sympathy. FWIW
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point to posting it on social media, we can't give her masters back to her? It's bad optics. Take this to court if she has legal standing.
Because record label contracts are hugely asymmetrical, even for Taylor Swift. I guess you don't care...
+1. And the only way for that to change is for the industry dynamics to be mad especially public so that public pressure can do its work.
Come on! Calling someone “gross” and a “bully” isn’t the way to do it. Taylor is nearly 30! Calling the new owner of her early work a poop head and meanie isn’t working.
How is it not working? It made you look.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t given a chance to buy it back. She offered to buy it back and they refused, they would only let her get it back if she signed a new contract with them, and then would give her one album back for each new one she created for them.
That is her side of the story. I don’t know the truth either but if her father, who she has a close relationship with, approved the sale, I tend to think she was given the rights to buy her music back.
I agree she is way too old for this childish social media tantrum.
Where are you seeing that her father approved the sale? I can’t find that reported anywhere.
+1. I read that they didn’t tell her father about the sale because they didn’t to take the chance that he would tell Taylor.
Not true. And this I know for a fact. Her father and the former owner both told Taylor about the sale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point to posting it on social media, we can't give her masters back to her? It's bad optics. Take this to court if she has legal standing.
Because record label contracts are hugely asymmetrical, even for Taylor Swift. I guess you don't care...
+1. And the only way for that to change is for the industry dynamics to be mad especially public so that public pressure can do its work.
Come on! Calling someone “gross” and a “bully” isn’t the way to do it. Taylor is nearly 30! Calling the new owner of her early work a poop head and meanie isn’t working.
Anonymous wrote:This is my issue with her. Really like her music, it's fun and catchy (honestly - liked some of her older country songs she released when she was younger even better than her current music) but she acts like an immature teen. And I say that as someone who wasn't even aware of this recent drama.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t given a chance to buy it back. She offered to buy it back and they refused, they would only let her get it back if she signed a new contract with them, and then would give her one album back for each new one she created for them.
That is her side of the story. I don’t know the truth either but if her father, who she has a close relationship with, approved the sale, I tend to think she was given the rights to buy her music back.
I agree she is way too old for this childish social media tantrum.
Where are you seeing that her father approved the sale? I can’t find that reported anywhere.
+1. I read that they didn’t tell her father about the sale because they didn’t to take the chance that he would tell Taylor.