Anonymous wrote:I’ve been in the district as a teacher and coach at Title 1 Schools. At a low performing school I was developing. Transferred to a Title 1 school doing the same thing and then was highly effective. This year I’m an Imstructional Coach AND Testing Coordinator who have two LEAP caseloads for walkthroughs, debriefs, etc and I MIGHT be effective. Twenty-five percent of my score is based on student achievement even though I’m not in front of the kids and half my caseload complains and refuses to do the work necessary to move student achievement. For example, I had a teacher flat out not write a lesson plan the entire year. The principal gave the previous coach highly edfectives each year and had 3/4 less tasks. IMPACT is all subjective to if the principal likes you for the most part. I also think there’s a cap on how many teachers in the low performing schools can get the bonus. I fully believe they are told how many to hand out. I’ve seen where a principal purposely “gave” a teacher a low score just so at the end it would average out to around 349ish just below the cutoff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:362, highly effective.
I played the game right. I started in bottom 40. Took the 20k bonuses & lift ladder steps. Now I am on easy street with a 5 star (well supported & funded) school.
The bonus isn’t so great anymore- but my base salary is high enough that it doesn’t matter.
There are well supported and funded schools in DCPS?
Yup. But they don’t have large bonuses. Which now only go to ward 7&8 schools anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ I’ve heard a lot of awful impact stories, but that’s the worst. What a joke this system is
I know someone whose principal flat-out lied about having observed the classroom. He literally was not in the room the day he said he was, according to the teacher.
Anonymous wrote:^^ I’ve heard a lot of awful impact stories, but that’s the worst. What a joke this system is
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I need to wait for IVA (PARCC scores) but the range they gave me could be anywhere from minimally effective to highly effective.
+1 and I got. 3.9 on my observation. Just sucks that 35 percent of my rating is based on PARCC. I don’t teach to the test, so I have to believe I taught them well, but 35%?
Anonymous wrote:I need to wait for IVA (PARCC scores) but the range they gave me could be anywhere from minimally effective to highly effective.
Anonymous wrote:And those schools are???? Ward 7 &8.
Anonymous wrote:*shrugs* the bonuses should really only go to the lowest of the lowest performing schools. If you want to make more money, then go there. I bet they have openings.
Anonymous wrote:Seriously? Even if you think the system is bad, why on earth would you ask teachers to share their performance evaluations.
How was your annual review OP?