People still peddling the “locker room talk” nonsense

SMDH

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well if a pussygrabber can be president why not?

There's a whole world of difference between locker room talk from a big mouth man and a man who raped a woman. But you know that.

Well, apparently he’s a rapist too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is always entirely possible he didn’t do it and that is why he remains defiant. Unlikely, but possible.

She said defense of Brett Kavanaugh or Donald Trump...NEVER. You can't really have it both ways. Oh, wait, he's a Democrat? Never mind, I guess it's okay then.

If it weren't for double standards, Democrats would have no standards.

another thing I can't believe a Republican can say without bursting into flames

So says the "family values"/"Christian" people that defend the man accused of assault by TWENTY-TWO women and caught on tape describing assault for fun, who had numerous affairs and cheated on his third wife after she had just given birth to their child and violated campaign finance laws to cover it up

Oh, irony...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is always entirely possible he didn’t do it and that is why he remains defiant. Unlikely, but possible.

She said defense of Brett Kavanaugh or Donald Trump...NEVER. You can't really have it both ways. Oh, wait, he's a Democrat? Never mind, I guess it's okay then.

If it weren't for double standards, Democrats would have no standards.

Anonymous wrote:His slogan will be “vote for the rapist, not the racist.”

You're good.

Anonymous wrote:Well if a pussygrabber can be president why not?

There's a whole world of difference between locker room talk from a big mouth man and a man who raped a woman. But you know that.

His slogan will be “vote for the rapist, not the racist.”

sure, there is always the possibility that Kavanaugh and Trump also didn't rape/assault anyone. Again, unlikely, but possible.

I'm not going out publicly to defend ANY of them. Not one.

You also can't have it both ways, though. You want to use the same argument for your side.

I was just throwing it out there. I don't think he should run. And I highly doubt he's innocent. The evidence out there does NOT look good for him.

Anonymous wrote:It is always entirely possible he didn’t do it and that is why he remains defiant. Unlikely, but possible.

She said defense of Brett Kavanaugh or Donald Trump...NEVER. You can't really have it both ways. Oh, wait, he's a Democrat? Never mind, I guess it's okay then.

It is always entirely possible he didn’t do it and that is why he remains defiant. Unlikely, but possible.

Good. Lord. This guy is nuts lol

Anonymous wrote:Running doesn’t mean winning

So unfortunate. He really did seem like a decent person until these allegations came out.

I wish we could all redo the last election knowing what we know now. I would have definitely gone a different way in the primaries.

I will not vote for him and I am shocked he even thinks he has a chance.

Exactly.

The accuser has until June to press charges in Massachusetts or the SOL run out. So if she doesn’t move forward after her tv interview and other press, then I’m unsure of whether I believe her anymore.

Running doesn’t mean winning

So unfortunate. He really did seem like a decent person until these allegations came out.

I wish we could all redo the last election knowing what we know now. I would have definitely gone a different way in the primaries.

I will not vote for him and I am shocked he even thinks he has a chance.

Anonymous wrote:Keep it klassy, va!

VA democraps, you mean.