Anonymous wrote:I found the racial disparity shocking because you either believe the 504's are legitimate and minority students are identified in a manner that is way out of bounds to not raise equity concerns or there are some people using 504's to game the system.
I think the answer is probably both for fwiw.
Anonymous wrote:Using extra time, students with 504s — and therefore less severe disabilities — performed better than the median test-taker, while students with more severe disabilities performed worse.
Shocking... Not!
Anonymous wrote:Not every student with a 504 is automatically afforded accommodations on the SAT or ACT. And if they do receive accommodations on one or both of these tests, it is often quite different than what they have in their 504 plan.
Perhaps the OP and the NYTimes don't understand this, but students with disabilities do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC received 50% extra time along with a reader and a scribe. It just takes longer to take a test with a reader and a scribe. He was ina room alone with his reader/scribe. No sanctimony about it. I think most people would prefer their children not to have disabilities, perhaps you are the exception.Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/17/upshot/nyc-schools-shsat-504.html
Second chart in this article- it gives an advantage across all races. Want to show this every parent who santimoniously claims they wish their kid didn’t need a 504 for ACT/SAT.
If someone is using a reader and a scribe the test is no longer testing reading comprehension and written expression but listening comprehension and oral expression. It fundamentally alters the test. If every student were tested almost all of them could be diagnosed with some disability that a crafty psychologist could write up as needing extra time. If the psychologist didn't, they wouldn't get new referrals. All they have to do is continue giving tests until something inevitably will be lower because everyone has strength and weaknesses.
Clearly, Asian families who have kids who struggle make them work harder 365 days a year while white students get their kids diagnosed with something to get extra time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/17/upshot/nyc-schools-shsat-504.html
Second chart in this article- it gives an advantage across all races. Want to show this every parent who santimoniously claims they wish their kid didn’t need a 504 for ACT/SAT.
Are you that afraid that your darling Larla can't compete against a kid with a documented learning disability?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found the racial disparity shocking because you either believe the 504's are legitimate and minority students are identified in a manner that is way out of bounds to not raise equity concerns or there are some people using 504's to game the system.
I think the answer is probably both for fwiw.
There was a time that the majority of students who were found eligible for special ed were minorities. This caused a backlash and was viewed as discriminatory. Being identified as haveing a learning or intellectual disability back then was a sure way to exlude a student and do offer them less. Schools were encouraged not to find minority children eligible. There was a lot of talk about the stigma of special ed and the associated problems with the labels. These views are still fairly pervasive in the aa community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC received 50% extra time along with a reader and a scribe. It just takes longer to take a test with a reader and a scribe. He was ina room alone with his reader/scribe. No sanctimony about it. I think most people would prefer their children not to have disabilities, perhaps you are the exception.Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/17/upshot/nyc-schools-shsat-504.html
Second chart in this article- it gives an advantage across all races. Want to show this every parent who santimoniously claims they wish their kid didn’t need a 504 for ACT/SAT.
If someone is using a reader and a scribe the test is no longer testing reading comprehension and written expression but listening comprehension and oral expression. It fundamentally alters the test. If every student were tested almost all of them could be diagnosed with some disability that a crafty psychologist could write up as needing extra time. If the psychologist didn't, they wouldn't get new referrals. All they have to do is continue giving tests until something inevitably will be lower because everyone has strength and weaknesses.
Clearly, Asian families who have kids who struggle make them work harder 365 days a year while white students get their kids diagnosed with something to get extra time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC received 50% extra time along with a reader and a scribe. It just takes longer to take a test with a reader and a scribe. He was ina room alone with his reader/scribe. No sanctimony about it. I think most people would prefer their children not to have disabilities, perhaps you are the exception.Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/17/upshot/nyc-schools-shsat-504.html
Second chart in this article- it gives an advantage across all races. Want to show this every parent who santimoniously claims they wish their kid didn’t need a 504 for ACT/SAT.
If someone is using a reader and a scribe the test is no longer testing reading comprehension and written expression but listening comprehension and oral expression. It fundamentally alters the test. If every student were tested almost all of them could be diagnosed with some disability that a crafty psychologist could write up as needing extra time. If the psychologist didn't, they wouldn't get new referrals. All they have to do is continue giving tests until something inevitably will be lower because everyone has strength and weaknesses.
Clearly, Asian families who have kids who struggle make them work harder 365 days a year while white students get their kids diagnosed with something to get extra time.
Anonymous wrote:I found the racial disparity shocking because you either believe the 504's are legitimate and minority students are identified in a manner that is way out of bounds to not raise equity concerns or there are some people using 504's to game the system.
I think the answer is probably both for fwiw.
Anonymous wrote:My DC received 50% extra time along with a reader and a scribe. It just takes longer to take a test with a reader and a scribe. He was ina room alone with his reader/scribe. No sanctimony about it. I think most people would prefer their children not to have disabilities, perhaps you are the exception.Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/17/upshot/nyc-schools-shsat-504.html
Second chart in this article- it gives an advantage across all races. Want to show this every parent who santimoniously claims they wish their kid didn’t need a 504 for ACT/SAT.