Anonymous wrote:I hate when people deride "easy" majors. Not everyone wants to do STEM. Not everyone cares about how much money they'll make. Sometimes people are really passionate about something and they follow that and they find deep personal and professional satisfaction in that field and don't care about the prestige or if they make high 6 figures.
I started off in a STEM major, yes, looking down my nose at "soft" majors. And then I struggled my butt off in advanced math; meanwhile, a professor told me I was a gifted writer and encouraged me to at least consider that as a minor. So I switched. I majored and writing and eventually added history as a second major.
I turned that into getting a MA in International Relations at a top 10. I wrote and published a book, and have a slew of newspaper, magazine, and journal clips. I do work I love every day. No, I am not wealthy. I'm hardly even what DCUM would consider well off. But I am happy with how my life has turned out. I have a roof over my head, people who love me, and I like to think what I do makes the world a slightly better place.
Maybe my pursuit and satisfaction of simpler things is not for you. Fine. But stop, for the love of god, with this suggestion that those of us who studied English or history or anthropology or childhood education are nothing but a bunch of slackers who were only looking for the easy way out and our job prospects being and end with "Welcome to Starbucks, how may I help you?"
Anonymous wrote:I hate when people deride "easy" majors. Not everyone wants to do STEM. Not everyone cares about how much money they'll make. Sometimes people are really passionate about something and they follow that and they find deep personal and professional satisfaction in that field and don't care about the prestige or if they make high 6 figures.
I started off in a STEM major, yes, looking down my nose at "soft" majors. And then I struggled my butt off in advanced math; meanwhile, a professor told me I was a gifted writer and encouraged me to at least consider that as a minor. So I switched. I majored and writing and eventually added history as a second major.
I turned that into getting a MA in International Relations at a top 10. I wrote and published a book, and have a slew of newspaper, magazine, and journal clips. I do work I love every day. No, I am not wealthy. I'm hardly even what DCUM would consider well off. But I am happy with how my life has turned out. I have a roof over my head, people who love me, and I like to think what I do makes the world a slightly better place.
Maybe my pursuit and satisfaction of simpler things is not for you. Fine. But stop, for the love of god, with this suggestion that those of us who studied English or history or anthropology or childhood education are nothing but a bunch of slackers who were only looking for the easy way out and our job prospects being and end with "Welcome to Starbucks, how may I help you?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this. My kid is in engineering with less than a 3.0 after freshman year. I was an elite student and my own prejudices make it hard for me to think there can still be success for him.
You should be proud of your daughter!
There is hope! My engineering major DC had a 2.8 first semester and GPA has been increasing - just got a 4.0 for spring semester sophomore year to end up w a 3.35 cumulative GPA!
Anonymous wrote:She’s lucky to have a job, no? But if she does her job well, that’s good. School is not for everybody.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this. My kid is in engineering with less than a 3.0 after freshman year. I was an elite student and my own prejudices make it hard for me to think there can still be success for him.
You should be proud of your daughter!
There is hope! My engineering major DC had a 2.8 first semester and GPA has been increasing - just got a 4.0 for spring semester sophomore year to end up w a 3.35 cumulative GPA!
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this. My kid is in engineering with less than a 3.0 after freshman year. I was an elite student and my own prejudices make it hard for me to think there can still be success for him.
You should be proud of your daughter!
I'd find out what the mean GPA is at his university. My engineering school curved to a 2.6 so by definition most had sub 3.0 GPAs.Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this. My kid is in engineering with less than a 3.0 after freshman year. I was an elite student and my own prejudices make it hard for me to think there can still be success for him.
You should be proud of your daughter!