In our club, which is a travel club, at the U10 level, everyone is guaranteed equal playing time on their own team except in a tournament, which this was not. Perhaps other travel clubs have different rules.
These are not "rules" by the way but stay angry about it.
Anonymous wrote:Better players play more. If this is a rec team where everyone is guaranteed 50% playing time then you have a point. It is a travel team and playing time is based on merit primarily.
In our club, which is a travel club, at the U10 level, everyone is guaranteed equal playing time on their own team except in a tournament, which this was not. Perhaps other travel clubs have different rules.
Better players play more. If this is a rec team where everyone is guaranteed 50% playing time then you have a point. It is a travel team and playing time is based on merit primarily.
Anonymous wrote:That's ridiculous. Not every kid is A team material, and that's fine. There is no reason that kids should not be able to get better at a sport, have a good experience, and play against players at their own level, or close to it.
Unless this happened every week at every game it isn't really a problem.
Why not? It's unfair and creates a bad experience for the kids. If I screamed at the top of my lungs every time a kid on my daughter's opposing team in softball got up to bat, but just for one game, would it be ok as long as it didn't happen every week at every game?
We are talking about two players, who are demonstratively better than the players on the team guest playing in one event or game and playing a majority of the minutes.
Better players play more. If this is a rec team where everyone is guaranteed 50% playing time then you have a point. It is a travel team and playing time is based on merit primarily.
It is not a regular occurrence and frankly the parents and players would not have even accepted the invitation to play if their kids were intended to be the sub.
Unless this happened every week at every game it isn't really a problem.
That's ridiculous. Not every kid is A team material, and that's fine. There is no reason that kids should not be able to get better at a sport, have a good experience, and play against players at their own level, or close to it.
Why not? It's unfair and creates a bad experience for the kids. If I screamed at the top of my lungs every time a kid on my daughter's opposing team in softball got up to bat, but just for one game, would it be ok as long as it didn't happen every week at every game?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My opinion on this is that clubs should be required to designate their teams' pecking order with state registration systems. For league seasons (fall and spring combined) limit that a player on the permanent roster cannot play "down" a level more than thrice a year and that no more than 3 higher level players can play down in a single match. The "3 and 3" rule. Also, no skipping down two levels if the club is that large. Lower level players would be allowed to play up a level on an unlimited basis. Standard game-day rostering sizes apply.
For tournaments, only three guest players allowed, max. Guest players include club-pass or outside of club players. This again limits the ability to stack teams to make club look better and deeper than they really are and provides paying customers of lower level teams with ample league and tournament playing opportunities. Always make it "3" so that refs, coaches, parents, and toruney officials don't get confused and can't realistically claim that "they did not know the rule".
No, if you are a player on a B, C, or D team your playing time should always be in question. If a better player in the club does guest play on the B or C team yes they should get a majority of the minutes over weaker players. That is how it is supposed to work. The takeaway that disgruntled parents should walk away with is how can their DD get to the A team players level and not worrying about your little B or C team silo.
Anonymous wrote:That’s standard practice in every club I’ve been a part of, in every sport.

Anonymous wrote:
The takeaway that disgruntled parents should walk away with is how can their DD get to the A team players level and not worrying about your little B or C team silo.
That's ridiculous. Not every kid is A team material, and that's fine. There is no reason that kids should not be able to get better at a sport, have a good experience, and play against players at their own level, or close to it.
The takeaway that disgruntled parents should walk away with is how can their DD get to the A team players level and not worrying about your little B or C team silo.
Anonymous wrote:My opinion on this is that clubs should be required to designate their teams' pecking order with state registration systems. For league seasons (fall and spring combined) limit that a player on the permanent roster cannot play "down" a level more than thrice a year and that no more than 3 higher level players can play down in a single match. The "3 and 3" rule. Also, no skipping down two levels if the club is that large. Lower level players would be allowed to play up a level on an unlimited basis. Standard game-day rostering sizes apply.
For tournaments, only three guest players allowed, max. Guest players include club-pass or outside of club players. This again limits the ability to stack teams to make club look better and deeper than they really are and provides paying customers of lower level teams with ample league and tournament playing opportunities. Always make it "3" so that refs, coaches, parents, and toruney officials don't get confused and can't realistically claim that "they did not know the rule".