Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Yet guns are far more lethal than say, a knife. A crazy guy went after a pack of kids in Japan a few weeks back and killed 1 kid. If you added a gun to that equation (guns are rare in Japan), a classroom full of kids would have been dead. It takes much longer/more physical power to knife someone to death.
And you say this from personal experience in committing homicide?
You just proved that you can't be reasoned with. -NP
How?
Do you or the PP know anything about stab wounds, slash wounds, or death from exsanguination? The bald assertion that all firearms are always more deadly than all blades weapons under all circumstances is unsupportable. Murders by blade have existed before recorded time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Yet guns are far more lethal than say, a knife. A crazy guy went after a pack of kids in Japan a few weeks back and killed 1 kid. If you added a gun to that equation (guns are rare in Japan), a classroom full of kids would have been dead. It takes much longer/more physical power to knife someone to death.
And you say this from personal experience in committing homicide?
You just proved that you can't be reasoned with. -NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Yet guns are far more lethal than say, a knife. A crazy guy went after a pack of kids in Japan a few weeks back and killed 1 kid. If you added a gun to that equation (guns are rare in Japan), a classroom full of kids would have been dead. It takes much longer/more physical power to knife someone to death.
And you say this from personal experience in committing homicide?
You just proved that you can't be reasoned with. -NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
This is a rightwing talking point that is so false I feel sorry for anyone who believes it.
If flamethrowers were legal mentally ill people would kill people with flamethrowers.
If grenades were legal mentally ill people would kill people with grenades.
If nerve gas were legal mentally ill people would kill people will nerve gas.
The solution is, as we recognize for most weapons, to ban flamethrowers, grenades, and nerve gas. Not flood the nation with them while conservative-media rubes whine about mental illness. (Mental illness treatment is a major problem. We should still do gun control.)
Handguns need to be banned in this country too. Just like we ban nerve gas and other weapons designed to kill people easily. Just like every other civilized country - from Canada to the UK to Australia - does. (Yes I know you can get a handgun license in Canada. But you have to transport it unloaded in a lockbox with a special permit. For all intents and purposes handguns are banned in Canada except at firing ranges.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Yet guns are far more lethal than say, a knife. A crazy guy went after a pack of kids in Japan a few weeks back and killed 1 kid. If you added a gun to that equation (guns are rare in Japan), a classroom full of kids would have been dead. It takes much longer/more physical power to knife someone to death.
And you say this from personal experience in committing homicide?
Anonymous wrote:More blood on Republican hands
Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC homicide is lower now than most years in the 80s-90s when the handgun ban was in effect. I would say you have a point about the law if the homicide rate went up after the Supreme Court ruled. But it hasn't. What the PP said about mental health is very important. Sadly this was how it was going to end for this woman gun law or not.
Have you heard about analysis that involves controlling for other factors? Factors other than the handgun ban are influencing the homicide race (changes in demographics, level of income etc.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Yet guns are far more lethal than say, a knife. A crazy guy went after a pack of kids in Japan a few weeks back and killed 1 kid. If you added a gun to that equation (guns are rare in Japan), a classroom full of kids would have been dead. It takes much longer/more physical power to knife someone to death.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.
There are plenty of ways to do the same thing without a gun. Or, you just get it illegally. This is a people issue.
Anonymous wrote:DC homicide is lower now than most years in the 80s-90s when the handgun ban was in effect. I would say you have a point about the law if the homicide rate went up after the Supreme Court ruled. But it hasn't. What the PP said about mental health is very important. Sadly this was how it was going to end for this woman gun law or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he did not legally have a hand gun, he easily could have gotten one or used another method. You are focusing on the wrong thing. We need better mental health, substance abuse treatment. And not for this family but we need better access to things like affordable health care, QUALITY health care, housing, food and jobs.
we need all of that, but it's also well-proven that access to guns makes murder and suicide more effective and frequent.
I don't disagree with more restrictions but saying that is the primary cause is not. This was a contentious divorce, probably lawyers made it worse as well a the court system and depending on if there was a DV or mental health background, he was probably looking at getting his kids every other weekend/maybe a night a week and basically losing his kids and his entire life as the courts are set up to benefit women depending on the state and judge. We don't know anything but simply put, this isn't a gun issue and its a society issue. Mental health treatment and many other things would have greatly helped.
No, this is very much an asshole-with-a-gun issue. No gun, no impulsive murder-suicide.