Wow. What an amazing nanny.

unfortunately she's almost certainly dead and the husband is almost certainly at fault. whether that will be proven? who knows.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He was a bad man when they met.

According to who?

According to his evil criminal behavior.
If think this kind of stuff just suddenly pops up, you’re delusional.

Anonymous wrote:
He was a bad man when they met.

According to who?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How stupid and arrogant are men that they think the mother of their children can go missing and people aren’t going to figure out they’re the reason, especially when there’s been a prolonged custody battle or other motivation?

Well, its worked for centuries so far.

Besides - the police can't charge him with murder with no body. He works in construction...they'd have to tear up the foundation of every house he's associated with that's currently in progress.

This would be my theory.

God bless that nanny and Grandma

He is also involved with litigation with her parents.

Apparently, her dad would advance him money to build a home and he would pay it back when the house sold. When she sued for divorce, he stopped paying back. Her father is suing for $2.5 million.

He alleges that when his wife disappeared, the nanny grabbed the kids and headed for wife's mother's apartment in NYC. Grandma isn't let him near the kids. He may have wanted the hearing to get custody. No hearing, no court order, and grandma isn't in contempt of court.

Anonymous wrote:He killed her and he still wants their Wednesday divorce hearing to happen? What would he gain from that?

He's pretending he doesn't know she's dead.

Also, he sounds a bit crazy. He made the kids practice water skiing 8 hours a day even though they hated it. In the hopes they would become champion water skiers.

He was a bad man when they met.

Anonymous wrote:This is a horrible story, and I was also struck that their home is 15k sqft?!

He's a builder. The home is as much a showpiece for his business (and also where his office is based) as it was an asset.

Anonymous wrote:He killed her and he still wants their Wednesday divorce hearing to happen? What would he gain from that?

I don't know...honestly.

If the judge proceeds with the divorce, he gains nothing and he loses nothing. She was a SAHM so no assets for him to be given. If the divorce proceeded, she would have gotten something in fact.

Weird. But maybe by saying she didn't show up and so he gets custody because she's negligent?

This is a horrible story, and I was also struck that their home is 15k sqft?!

He killed her and he still wants their Wednesday divorce hearing to happen? What would he gain from that?

Anonymous wrote:Heartbreaking. Teach your your children honesty.
Cheating is a fraggin bit*h.

*freggin

Heartbreaking. Teach your your children honesty.
Cheating is a fraggin bit*h.