Anonymous wrote:Yes, absolutely. Not always, but often. The kids who have air pods, 3 Helly Hanson jackets, an iphone x, and shoes worth more than my monthly salary. Others have stories of spring break trips to France. The kid sitting next to them has one sweatshirt and spring break is watching netflix for a week.
Anonymous wrote:
Your privilege is showing. You are confusing the unimportant variations within the middle class to the larger inequalities in our population.
If the school has your child on the list for Free and Reduced Meals because you signed up for that service, and the school counselor fills your child's backpack with canned food and clothes before each school break, and the teacher notices that your child is hungry in class, and cannot bring in headphones, or field trip money, or anything like that, then obviously they know the family is poor.
In our Bethesda school, this happens. I'm on the PTA Board, I help organize donations. In schools in Silver Spring and elsewhere, there are so many children eligible for FARMS that MCPS just institutes free breakfast for all students, to minimize social impact, but they still know who can afford to buy/bring lunch, and who cannot.
Get your head of your bubble and see the world for what it is, it will help you understand why people vote the way they do.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, absolutely. Not always, but often. The kids who have air pods, 3 Helly Hanson jackets, an iphone x, and shoes worth more than my monthly salary. Others have stories of spring break trips to France. The kid sitting next to them has one sweatshirt and spring break is watching netflix for a week.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why so many posters on this board are so anti private. I know it is expensive that is why we started saving when DD was born. We also chose to only have one child. Education is a priority in my family.
Personally if I had to choose between a new car every year in HS or a private college -- I would chose the private college.
In regards to this thread -- I think often what appears to be financial differences -- is often simply a difference in priorities.
Anonymous wrote:
It’s part of the diversity of experience. There are going to be people who are a lot richer than you and people who ate a lot poorer. And a bunch of people in between.
If you value diversity, which everyone claims to, then you have to have rich kids too. They’re part of the social makeup of society as much as anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I crazy for thinking that's crazy? Who would know or care?
This is probably very upper middle class of me, but I don't care who rich the other kids are, as long as they don't flaunt it. I think when people are asking about this during home buying, they are probably looking at schools that are similar academically, but they're trying to get a read on the social situation. Are the wealthy kids show-offs, or are they modest? Do the richest families control the social hierarchy at school?
Who cares? It's none of your business what a bunch of kids are doing.
That's right, but it's my kids' community. If I could wave a magic wand, I'd make wealth and income disparities a non-issue for them. (And yes, PP, I'm aware that my UMC kids are privileged, too.)
Anonymous wrote:Not a teacher here; just a parent.
My DD went to a public HS with many rich kids. We compensated by making sure DD always had spending $ (monthly allowance). I thought it would help her to be able to pay for lunches, etc ... Sure maybe we don't live in a mansion but at least she could afford to go to a movie when she wanted. Also odd is that many of the wealthy kids never had any spending money.
I found it most interesting when some of the apparently wealthy kids ended up going to the state college whereas my DD is going private.
Point being is that sometimes it is all about priorities; not just money.
Anonymous wrote:Not a teacher here; just a parent.
My DD went to a public HS with many rich kids. We compensated by making sure DD always had spending $ (monthly allowance). I thought it would help her to be able to pay for lunches, etc ... Sure maybe we don't live in a mansion but at least she could afford to go to a movie when she wanted. Also odd is that many of the wealthy kids never had any spending money.
I found it most interesting when some of the apparently wealthy kids ended up going to the state college whereas my DD is going private.
Point being is that sometimes it is all about priorities; not just money.