Anonymous wrote:
The colorful people are the dress attendants, who designed the dress and were tasked with arranging it that day.
I see nothing wrong with their dresses, however they are not elegant. Perhaps this is on purpose, to distinguish them from the guests.
And yes, I totally prefer the British custom of children accompanying the bride and groom than adults (with their drama, upstage concerns, dress resentment, etc).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?
Ugh, people like you are the worst.
We should all be closed minded simpletons like you, who can't ever discuss anything outside of DC?
As if there haven't been 98 page threads about everything royal already?![]()
That’s the freaking point! Find an appropriate venue for the gazillion royals threads. This ain’t it. No one here knows who the heck “Lady Gabriella” is and no one cares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?
Ugh, people like you are the worst.
We should all be closed minded simpletons like you, who can't ever discuss anything outside of DC?
As if there haven't been 98 page threads about everything royal already?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there some royals forum you can go to with this? Why are you posting about obscure royalty on a DC-based board?
Anonymous wrote:Those aren't bridesmaids, she had baby bridesmaids per tradition (which I honestly prefer to telling your friends what to wear).

Anonymous wrote:I think they are very pretty. Good to know that we all have different taste in clothing. I just don’t go to weddings at castles , so would never have somewhere to wear it. The hat is over the top.
Anonymous wrote:They are very couture. Beautiful.