Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are kids who can comprehend lord of the rings at age 4 so reading Harry Potter at age 8 seems reasonable for gifted kids.
There are kids who can read the words at 4, very few kids, but comprehend? Doubtful. There are kids who can complete calculus problems at 4 but do they understand the concepts? Huge difference between sounding out the words and comprehension.
Yes. Comprehend. They exist. However there are only a few. Just like there are a few kids who will understand the concepts behind the Pythagorean theorem and completing the square at age 4.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are kids who can comprehend lord of the rings at age 4 so reading Harry Potter at age 8 seems reasonable for gifted kids.
There are kids who can read the words at 4, very few kids, but comprehend? Doubtful. There are kids who can complete calculus problems at 4 but do they understand the concepts? Huge difference between sounding out the words and comprehension.
Anonymous wrote:There are kids who can comprehend lord of the rings at age 4 so reading Harry Potter at age 8 seems reasonable for gifted kids.
Anonymous wrote:There are kids who can comprehend lord of the rings at age 4 so reading Harry Potter at age 8 seems reasonable for gifted kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. It bugs me to no end when parents brag about their kids reading Harry Potter in K-2. It doesn’t mean anything. And frankly, it’s not appropriate in my opinion it read those books so young.
Preach! I am a reading teacher and I completely agree.![]()
Totally agree. I confess, my kid read it in 2nd. Why? It was the "thing" to do in her second grade class. I'm sure it was started by some parent who really wanted her kid to read it early. So all the kids read it or least said they did, and so much went over their heads. Whoosh. Then they all re-read it again in 4th-5th and they got it at a whole new level and loved it. Should never have bothered with the early reading.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS is a 2nd grader going into AAP next year. We haven't seen DRA test results since K but he's currently reading the 3rd Harry Potter. His absolutely favorites are the I Survived... books
Not sure if that can be extrapolated to DRA level.
FWIW I didn't encourage him to read Harry Potter and would have been fine with him waiting for a couple years but he found them on Amazon Freetime on his kindle.
The books kids read tell something about reading ability, but they usually far exceed DRA because when you read for pleasure you might skim over words you don't know, not realize you're not getting the sub-text, sub-plots, gist etc. and still find enjoyable parts of the story. The DRA is a rigorous measure of fluency and comprehension and kids usually perform far lower on it than you would estimate based on their reading interests. This sometimes leads people to think the scores are "wrong" but they are just careful in assessment (though that doesn't mean that some kids don't engage in the test fully or have something blocking the expression of their true reading ability for instance, ADD is an issue for skipping words/blurting out first thoughts and given that it's oral, speech delays and auditory processing can impact also.
+1. It bugs me to no end when parents brag about their kids reading Harry Potter in K-2. It doesn’t mean anything. And frankly, it’s not appropriate in my opinion it read those books so young.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. It bugs me to no end when parents brag about their kids reading Harry Potter in K-2. It doesn’t mean anything. And frankly, it’s not appropriate in my opinion it read those books so young.
Preach! I am a reading teacher and I completely agree.![]()
But I read it somewhere that if a kid does not understand a HP book (or any book that is way too advanced for his/her age), he/she will not continues reading the whole book not even mention the whole series. Showing interested in these books at such a young age some what shows a kid's advanced reading ability. A kid who is not a good reader will not even try to read these books - wouldn't you agree on that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. It bugs me to no end when parents brag about their kids reading Harry Potter in K-2. It doesn’t mean anything. And frankly, it’s not appropriate in my opinion it read those books so young.
Preach! I am a reading teacher and I completely agree.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. It bugs me to no end when parents brag about their kids reading Harry Potter in K-2. It doesn’t mean anything. And frankly, it’s not appropriate in my opinion it read those books so young.
Preach! I am a reading teacher and I completely agree.![]()
Totally agree. I confess, my kid read it in 2nd. Why? It was the "thing" to do in her second grade class. I'm sure it was started by some parent who really wanted her kid to read it early. So all the kids read it or least said they did, and so much went over their heads. Whoosh. Then they all re-read it again in 4th-5th and they got it at a whole new level and loved it. Should never have bothered with the early reading.