Anonymous wrote:WISC-V FSIQ is 126, GAI 130. Looks like subsection scores VCI:116 and FRI:140 are mainly what they look at? Hoping the very high FRI gets her in on appeal?? Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:WISC-V FSIQ is 126, GAI 130. Looks like subsection scores VCI:116 and FRI:140 are mainly what they look at? Hoping the very high FRI gets her in on appeal?? Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:I just want to say good luck- your child will thrive in AAP with these scores. (I have an older child in AAP). I’m hope the appeal works, this system is so wonky.
Anonymous wrote:I would submit the DAS-II but not the WISC. DAS-II is slightly stronger overall, and the 99th percentile verbal score might be compelling to the committee. For the WISC, they don't care that much about the VSI, and the average FRI score could be a problem.
For your letter, I would focus on the verbal abilities and how your child's needs in language arts cannot be met in general education. The 121 nonverbal reasoning score shows that your child should be able to handle the AAP math.
Anonymous wrote:When aap rejects a kid and that kid goes on to score in the 120s on the WISC then aap got it right. This is the process working very well.
Now of course the rub is that many kids accepted into aap won’t score above 130 on the WISC either. It’s not fair. But keeping out the 120 kids is exactly what aap is trying to do.
20% of FCPS is in aap? 20% of FCPS kids would not have IQs over 130. So while it seems unfair, you can’t blame FCPS for trying to control the aap population better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had 127 Nnat, 133 Cogat, on Gbrs, 2O, 2F. Got 127 on WISC, which is 96th percentile. Will appeal. Anyone has any inputs?
The GBRS is why your kid was rejected. I doubt that a 127 WISC will be enough to overcome the GBRS, but I wish you the best of luck.
Really seems like a 127 wisc should be given more weight than the teacher review here where all the test scores are similar. I mean come on. Half of AAP is kids with lower IQs than this if they tested everyone.
PP's kid is almost certainly smarter than half of the kids in AAP. That doesn't mean the kid will get accepted. FCPS places way too much emphasis on the teacher reviews.
We got unlucky this year with a new teacher. My kid is a smart, extrovert kid and asks lots of questions. Perhaps the temperaments of teacher and kiddo did not match. We are Asian and I read a few other threads and maybe that’s another reason for discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had 127 Nnat, 133 Cogat, on Gbrs, 2O, 2F. Got 127 on WISC, which is 96th percentile. Will appeal. Anyone has any inputs?
The GBRS is why your kid was rejected. I doubt that a 127 WISC will be enough to overcome the GBRS, but I wish you the best of luck.
Really seems like a 127 wisc should be given more weight than the teacher review here where all the test scores are similar. I mean come on. Half of AAP is kids with lower IQs than this if they tested everyone.
PP's kid is almost certainly smarter than half of the kids in AAP. That doesn't mean the kid will get accepted. FCPS places way too much emphasis on the teacher reviews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had 127 Nnat, 133 Cogat, on Gbrs, 2O, 2F. Got 127 on WISC, which is 96th percentile. Will appeal. Anyone has any inputs?
The GBRS is why your kid was rejected. I doubt that a 127 WISC will be enough to overcome the GBRS, but I wish you the best of luck.
Really seems like a 127 wisc should be given more weight than the teacher review here where all the test scores are similar. I mean come on. Half of AAP is kids with lower IQs than this if they tested everyone.