Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it's great. I felt strongly that any girls I had would have family names from my side of the family. And actually, I would have held my DH to that if we'd had more than 1 boy too. He only had any sort of naming "right" on the first boy. After that, all my family. Why? I changed my last name and the kids have that last name, so I get the rest of the names.
How totally sexist.
All family names came from my side since we all have his last name. One of my sons has my mom's maiden name as his middle name. The other has my dad's name as his middle.
DP How is this sexist? You are doing the exact same thing! Except for the eldest boy..
Op: To answer your question. Using your first name as middle name is fine. I have cousins named after the father and the mother as first names!
Sexist because the girls would have names from her family, but not the boys.
I'm the first PP quoted. I conceded on the first boy having my DH's name as a middle because he wanted it to be his FIRST name and I did not want that at all. So I compromised with the middle. If we'd had more than 2 children (we did not) he would have only had the oldest boy from his side. We only had two, so it was split. If we'd have two girls, I would have had both middle names. Sure if I was re-doing things maybe I would have fought harder to have my DS' middle come from my side, but I was just happy to not have three living males with the same firstname lastname combo.