Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Odd how segregation gets celebrated now . Dr king would be appalled
Celebrating native born District residents is not segregation.
Anonymous wrote:DC city council just voted to make May 20 “DC Natives Day.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused here . Wasn’t it racism that caused whites to flee? Now the grandkids of those whites are moving back and that’s racist too?
The mass exodus of whites from the cities to the suburbs in the '60s was indeed motivated by race, specifically the desegregation of schools and neighborhoods.
White folks wadn't trying to have their kids going to school with them so they fled. White folks wadn't thrilled with the idea of them moving in next door so they fled.
Now the script has flipped as far as the migration is concerned. Whites are fleeing the suburbs and moving into the cities because it's more expensive.
So when you take into consideration the huge contrast in wealth disparity between whites and blacks you may as well say that ain't a damn thing changed cause whites still don't want their kids going to school with them (unless they're pulling in 6-figures) and whites still aren't thrilled about the idea of them living next door (unless they're pulling in 6-figures).
The more things change the more they stay the same I guess.
Anonymous wrote:so a racist motive is better than a homophobic one?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious if anti gentrification advocates are homophobes given many of the “gentrifiers” who first live in tend to be gay?
So anti-gentrification advocates aren't upset about the decrease of affordable housing and black businesses disappearing they're just upset about gays.
Gotcha.
Anonymous wrote:Odd how segregation gets celebrated now . Dr king would be appalled
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused here . Wasn’t it racism that caused whites to flee? Now the grandkids of those whites are moving back and that’s racist too?
The mass exodus of whites from the cities to the suburbs in the '60s was indeed motivated by race, specifically the desegregation of schools and neighborhoods.
White folks wadn't trying to have their kids going to school with them so they fled. White folks wadn't thrilled with the idea of them moving in next door so they fled.
Now the script has flipped as far as the migration is concerned. Whites are fleeing the suburbs and moving into the cities because it's more expensive.
So when you take into consideration the huge contrast in wealth disparity between whites and blacks you may as well say that ain't a damn thing changed cause whites still don't want their kids going to school with them (unless they're pulling in 6-figures) and whites still aren't thrilled about the idea of them living next door (unless they're pulling in 6-figures).
The more things change the more they stay the same I guess.
no one wants to be around ghetto people (of all races) including and most importantly middle class+ blacks who want a more positive future for their children
how are people being displaced ? Dud buildings get knocked down? Dc used to have a population of 800,000 in 1950. Now it has 700,000Anonymous wrote:Affluent people moving into the city is largely a good thing, it means more tax revenue for the city, it means poor and affluent people are less isolated from each other, in DC and many other places it been accompanied by growth that has been good.
However new people should respect the people who have already lived there, and not have condescending colonial attitudes.
And cities should all enough building of new housing so that all the new residents are not displacing old residents (especially renters, who will not get the benefits of older homeowners selling). Some policies on affordable housing should be implemented so that the city does not resegregate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused here . Wasn’t it racism that caused whites to flee? Now the grandkids of those whites are moving back and that’s racist too?
The mass exodus of whites from the cities to the suburbs in the '60s was indeed motivated by race, specifically the desegregation of schools and neighborhoods.
White folks wadn't trying to have their kids going to school with them so they fled. White folks wadn't thrilled with the idea of them moving in next door so they fled.
Now the script has flipped as far as the migration is concerned. Whites are fleeing the suburbs and moving into the cities because it's more expensive.
So when you take into consideration the huge contrast in wealth disparity between whites and blacks you may as well say that ain't a damn thing changed cause whites still don't want their kids going to school with them (unless they're pulling in 6-figures) and whites still aren't thrilled about the idea of them living next door (unless they're pulling in 6-figures).
The more things change the more they stay the same I guess.
Anonymous wrote:I’m confused here . Wasn’t it racism that caused whites to flee? Now the grandkids of those whites are moving back and that’s racist too?
Anonymous wrote:so a racist motive is better than a homophobic one?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious if anti gentrification advocates are homophobes given many of the “gentrifiers” who first live in tend to be gay?
So anti-gentrification advocates aren't upset about the decrease of affordable housing and black businesses disappearing they're just upset about gays.
Gotcha.