Anonymous wrote:I think some of the pushback is from the sense that the way OP frames it is a bit like "the social betters should sacrifice by sending their kids to these schools, because they are a gift to these schools." It smacks a bit of a savior complex.
The best good works aren't doing things "for" people, but doing things "with" people. I am religious, and I do think that many people do have the attitude that they should do what's "best" for their children and screw everyone else. (Often with a pretty narrow view of what's "best.") What's best for my kid is to go to a school where she's safe and can learn, but also where she can learn with and be friends with kids outside her little slice of the world, and learn how to get long with people who aren't from the same race or class or country as she is. That's valuable for her as a person, and as a citizen, and in her future work.
And my religious beliefs also teach me not to make decisions out of fear, but out of love and in trust. I'm not supposed to hoard the good things in life, but be willing to share them and recognize that the more we share, the more there is to share. The loaves and the fishes multiply, and there is enough to feed everyone.
Anonymous wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and put this out here, mostly because DCUM is anonymous. I know in liberal DC (we're liberal, just also religious Christians) talk of religious stuff is kind of taboo.
BUT
Here's the thing - we made a decision to be committed to DCPS and the sometimes-difficult integration it requires out of a sense of Christian obligation, the idea that getting what's best for me is not actually what I'm supposed to be doing in life. (And I can imagine many others feeling a similar ethical calling regardless of faith tradition, or altruistic humanists, etc.)
I don't ask this to denigrate anyone's choices - but is there anyone out there like us? Who decided rather than some episcopal day school or Catholic school that might teach religion, that being a good neighbor meant actually trying to work alongside your neighbors to make DCPS all that it can be?
Just a question, not a criticism of anyone. (Sometimes it just feels kind of like there is no one out there in DC like us, and I wonder if that is true.)
Anonymous wrote:Not religious, but the ethics does weigh on the decision. We try to make a difference there benefitting more than just our own kids.
Anonymous wrote:Not religious, but the ethics does weigh on the decision. We try to make a difference there benefitting more than just our own kids.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t live in DC but I don’t agree with PPs criticizing OP. I think it’s a nice thing when people that have better options choose to send their kids to public school. All the chides about “gracing” the schools with her presence and implying OP’s thoughts are racist are ignoring real issues with struggling public schools. Those schools could benefit from buy in from higher income parents that can donate to the PTA. And studies show schools with concentrated poverty suffer.
Isn't it good that OP is choosing to integrate/help deconcentrate poverty? Don’t people that choose to go private or option get vilified for fleeing/opting out? Is every choice made by UMC parents automatically racist and terrible?