Anonymous wrote:Md doesn't want a bridge. Not much you can do if one side doesn't want a bridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never going to happen in the agricultural preserve of MoCo, which is the only option, pretty much.
Forget it.
A better option would be another identical crossing right next to the current one, use both, that way, if anything happened on one span all the traffic could use the other. A crash won't shut down both spans.
Oh hell no. Induced demand. Will make all state roads that feed into both bridges on both sides complete hellholes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened last week?
About the worst thing, short of the bridge collapsing, that could have happened. A fuel tanker crashed on the American Legion Bridge.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/397573447-video
Wasn't it prior to the bridge--on the Virginia side? It blocked almost all lanes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened last week?
About the worst thing, short of the bridge collapsing, that could have happened. A fuel tanker crashed on the American Legion Bridge.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/397573447-video
Anonymous wrote:What happened last week?
Unless the traffic is so bad the federal government decides they need it in the interest of national security.
Anonymous wrote:Hahahaha.
Yes, so many people around here want another bridge crossing, but it's not going to happen. First, you need to have MD and VA state governments and then county governments all in agreement on having the bridge and funding the local feeder roads that will get to and from the bridge. Then you have to have federal highway support for the bridge. It will be very, very expensive and you will need to have lots of commitments from every one of those jurisdictions to make it happen. Then it will require decades of studies on environmental impact, design, planning and cooperation. Take a look at the history of the ICC and the Purple Line programs and those were only state and county cooperating with the federal highway administration. Now add in a second state and a second county government to make those happen.
Even if all five of the governments were on-board, it would likely take 2-3 decades to get to the point of breaking ground on the project. It's unlikely to be available anytime in most of the working lives of everyone on this board. Maybe when our children are working in this area, but it will not be in time to bring relief to anyone currently working in the area.
Anonymous wrote:A second crossing would be great for Germantown, Boyds, Gaithersburg, and Rockville. It would be great from a commute standpoint for Potomac and Darnestown.
Yes! Think about the commute from Sterling/Ashburn to Rockville. It takes over an hour on a good day. As the crow flies, it should take twenty minutes.
A second crossing would be great for Germantown, Boyds, Gaithersburg, and Rockville. It would be great from a commute standpoint for Potomac and Darnestown.
Anonymous wrote:Point of rocks bridge (15) also needs replaced badly.
Anonymous wrote:Forget the outer bridge. Time for the inner tunnel.