Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small footprints/acreage = underground parking, creative fields/playgrounds
+1
My architect family members say that underground parking costs out at $20K per spot.
DCPS officially is not building parking anymore. In Ward 3, Mary Cheh got DCPS to put in off street parking st Janney and Murch. Now John Eaton is finally getting a renovation (the last in line in Ward 3),and there will be no parking. The HSA actually begs parents to give their visitor parking placards to school staff, but then school neighbors can’t find parking themselves. So this short term fix will end. Cheh’s answer to Eaton staff was to provide information about Metro.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small footprints/acreage = underground parking, creative fields/playgrounds
+1
My architect family members say that underground parking costs out at $20K per spot.
Anonymous wrote:DC has much stricter requirements to use local/minority owned firms. Even if they are not nearly has qualified as a larger design construction firms. I work in contracting and I see this all the time across all fields.small firms are slower to respond to changes, cannot absorb costs, poor at cost estimating, lots of modifications and change orders. all adds up to major delays and doubling of costs. its a really dumb way to do business. and to the previous poster, underground parking can cost a LOT more than 20k per space, can easily run 30-50k depending on location and number of levels underground.
Anonymous wrote:Everything is done differently in DC.
Anonymous wrote:DC has much stricter requirements to use local/minority owned firms. Even if they are not nearly has qualified as a larger design construction firms. I work in contracting and I see this all the time across all fields.small firms are slower to respond to changes, cannot absorb costs, poor at cost estimating, lots of modifications and change orders. all adds up to major delays and doubling of costs. its a really dumb way to do business. and to the previous poster, underground parking can cost a LOT more than 20k per space, can easily run 30-50k depending on location and number of levels underground.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 1999 NCS renovated an old field house to create a new athletic facility. Most of the 83,000 sq. ft. building is underground, and the project included a parking garage. It had many of the hallmarks that fold here are claiming raise costs, such as ANC battles. In fact, this one had a zoning board dispute and legal challenges from the neighbors. The NCS project was a $20 million building, which would be $30 million in today's dollars.
As a DC taxpayer I really don't understand these $150 million school renovations. One of the many downsides of the costs is that schools in desperate need of facilities improvements wait for years because it takes so long to budget these large amounts.
Also, the ANC's are advisory; it's in the name. No one in DC government needs to listen to them. As long as proper public notice is given, that box is checked.
Obviously, a field house is not the same as a full high school including a gym. DCPS isn't building $150 million gyms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has much stricter requirements to use local/minority owned firms. Even if they are not nearly has qualified as a larger design construction firms. I work in contracting and I see this all the time across all fields.small firms are slower to respond to changes, cannot absorb costs, poor at cost estimating, lots of modifications and change orders. all adds up to major delays and doubling of costs. its a really dumb way to do business. and to the previous poster, underground parking can cost a LOT more than 20k per space, can easily run 30-50k depending on location and number of levels underground.
I love when someone with some actual knowledge chimes in.
Anonymous wrote:In 1999 NCS renovated an old field house to create a new athletic facility. Most of the 83,000 sq. ft. building is underground, and the project included a parking garage. It had many of the hallmarks that fold here are claiming raise costs, such as ANC battles. In fact, this one had a zoning board dispute and legal challenges from the neighbors. The NCS project was a $20 million building, which would be $30 million in today's dollars.
As a DC taxpayer I really don't understand these $150 million school renovations. One of the many downsides of the costs is that schools in desperate need of facilities improvements wait for years because it takes so long to budget these large amounts.
Also, the ANC's are advisory; it's in the name. No one in DC government needs to listen to them. As long as proper public notice is given, that box is checked.
Anonymous wrote:DC has much stricter requirements to use local/minority owned firms. Even if they are not nearly has qualified as a larger design construction firms. I work in contracting and I see this all the time across all fields.small firms are slower to respond to changes, cannot absorb costs, poor at cost estimating, lots of modifications and change orders. all adds up to major delays and doubling of costs. its a really dumb way to do business. and to the previous poster, underground parking can cost a LOT more than 20k per space, can easily run 30-50k depending on location and number of levels underground.
Anonymous wrote:DC has much stricter requirements to use local/minority owned firms. Even if they are not nearly has qualified as a larger design construction firms. I work in contracting and I see this all the time across all fields.small firms are slower to respond to changes, cannot absorb costs, poor at cost estimating, lots of modifications and change orders. all adds up to major delays and doubling of costs. its a really dumb way to do business. and to the previous poster, underground parking can cost a LOT more than 20k per space, can easily run 30-50k depending on location and number of levels underground.
Anonymous wrote:In 1999 NCS renovated an old field house to create a new athletic facility. Most of the 83,000 sq. ft. building is underground, and the project included a parking garage. It had many of the hallmarks that fold here are claiming raise costs, such as ANC battles. In fact, this one had a zoning board dispute and legal challenges from the neighbors. The NCS project was a $20 million building, which would be $30 million in today's dollars.
As a DC taxpayer I really don't understand these $150 million school renovations. One of the many downsides of the costs is that schools in desperate need of facilities improvements wait for years because it takes so long to budget these large amounts.
Also, the ANC's are advisory; it's in the name. No one in DC government needs to listen to them. As long as proper public notice is given, that box is checked.
Anonymous wrote:OP: Some of these firms who have achieved cost overruns continue to be hired by the city.
The name Perkins Eastman comes up as one of these. Why isn't there more pushback from
the public, city council when these same firms are selected over the years?
Anonymous wrote:Neighbors also factor in this. The ANC approval process can make adjustments based on community needs more expensive. Also the costs to operate swing space during renovation is almost always included in the construction price. See the cost of Duke Ellington, for example, which had not only one but two swing space renovations embedded in the overall cost.