Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Part of the problem is that FOX is the only 24 hour news station. You can get FOX news at 1 a.m. while CNN and MSNBC are running true crime shows. It would be nice to have news choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
I literally don’t understand what it is about Fox that seduces so many people. Like brainwashing that induces them to sacrifice their critical thinking. It’s so sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Part of the problem is that FOX is the only 24 hour news station. You can get FOX news at 1 a.m. while CNN and MSNBC are running trump crime shows. It would be nice to have news choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Yes, and it's been proven that Fox is propaganda (and MSNBC and CNN are not - they're just profit-first infotainment):
Fox propaganda study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.20160812
Data in this study is from 1998-2008. Fox was propaganda then and Fox is propaganda now.
And anyone who watches Fox willingly is a dupe and a fool who is getting screwed by Rupert Murdoch. (That includes all the GOP Congressmen who have it on in their offices. They're low IQ morons installed by the GOP donors.)
Anonymous wrote:Fox is not a news organization, but rather a political propaganda group. It should be treated as such by the law. Govern it by the FEC, not the FCC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meh. Kind of reminds me of how the WaPo initially silenced the Vanessa Tyson accusation of Justin Fairfax. So interesting, right?!
So clear that you didn’t read this article, right?
Falzone has the Stormy story dead to rights. She had researched it for months and had multiple sources and had seen the documents. Then her editors at Fox shut her down and made her sign an NDA.
Not at all the same. And I’m someone who wants Fairfax to resign.
+1
They killed the story, killed it dead. Why? Because Murdoch wanted Trump to win - it has the quote in the New Yorker article, the article you didn’t read. All the charges you cons make about the media being so friendly to the liberals is projection. It’s the conservatives who have Fox in their pocket, working in tandem.
Stormy Daniels was free to go to any media outlet that she wanted to to tell her story.
When she decided it was in her best interest to do so, she did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meh. Kind of reminds me of how the WaPo initially silenced the Vanessa Tyson accusation of Justin Fairfax. So interesting, right?!
So clear that you didn’t read this article, right?
Falzone has the Stormy story dead to rights. She had researched it for months and had multiple sources and had seen the documents. Then her editors at Fox shut her down and made her sign an NDA.
Not at all the same. And I’m someone who wants Fairfax to resign.
+1
They killed the story, killed it dead. Why? Because Murdoch wanted Trump to win - it has the quote in the New Yorker article, the article you didn’t read. All the charges you cons make about the media being so friendly to the liberals is projection. It’s the conservatives who have Fox in their pocket, working in tandem.
Stormy Daniels was free to go to any media outlet that she wanted to to tell her story.
When she decided it was in her best interest to do so, she did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meh. Kind of reminds me of how the WaPo initially silenced the Vanessa Tyson accusation of Justin Fairfax. So interesting, right?!
So clear that you didn’t read this article, right?
Falzone has the Stormy story dead to rights. She had researched it for months and had multiple sources and had seen the documents. Then her editors at Fox shut her down and made her sign an NDA.
Not at all the same. And I’m someone who wants Fairfax to resign.
+1
They killed the story, killed it dead. Why? Because Murdoch wanted Trump to win - it has the quote in the New Yorker article, the article you didn’t read. All the charges you cons make about the media being so friendly to the liberals is projection. It’s the conservatives who have Fox in their pocket, working in tandem.
Anonymous wrote:The media endorses candidates. As long as this continues, they are not reliable sources.