Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
I see no problem for parents wanting to choose a school with more or less diversity. However, trying to make a school more or less diverse, is not the same thing.
Depends on the diversity, and the reason, eh?
Doesn't matter at all. That is purely personal choice. I do not need to know why other people make those personal choices, even if their reasons were evil.
Trying to shape a school, is not a personal choice, and that matters. My opinion on that is, do NOT deliberately make schools more or less diverse, and do not use "diversity" as a criteria to judge schools.
But when all the minority majority schools consistently score at the bottom of just about every objective criteria, where do we go from there? Why does inclusion always correspond to a lowering of standards? Until that is truly addressed it is neaive to not expect pushback no matter the fervor of the kumbaya mandate. While easy to label it racism, one might find some benefit to taking a step back and analyzing the dominant party’s struggle to propagate that privilege/dominance. At the very least learning more about the actual mechanics could both assist with emulation and elimination.
What the hell does this mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
I see no problem for parents wanting to choose a school with more or less diversity. However, trying to make a school more or less diverse, is not the same thing.
Depends on the diversity, and the reason, eh?
Doesn't matter at all. That is purely personal choice. I do not need to know why other people make those personal choices, even if their reasons were evil.
Trying to shape a school, is not a personal choice, and that matters. My opinion on that is, do NOT deliberately make schools more or less diverse, and do not use "diversity" as a criteria to judge schools.
But when all the minority majority schools consistently score at the bottom of just about every objective criteria, where do we go from there? Why does inclusion always correspond to a lowering of standards? Until that is truly addressed it is neaive to not expect pushback no matter the fervor of the kumbaya mandate. While easy to label it racism, one might find some benefit to taking a step back and analyzing the dominant party’s struggle to propagate that privilege/dominance. At the very least learning more about the actual mechanics could both assist with emulation and elimination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
I see no problem for parents wanting to choose a school with more or less diversity. However, trying to make a school more or less diverse, is not the same thing.
Depends on the diversity, and the reason, eh?
Doesn't matter at all. That is purely personal choice. I do not need to know why other people make those personal choices, even if their reasons were evil.
Trying to shape a school, is not a personal choice, and that matters. My opinion on that is, do NOT deliberately make schools more or less diverse, and do not use "diversity" as a criteria to judge schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
I see no problem for parents wanting to choose a school with more or less diversity. However, trying to make a school more or less diverse, is not the same thing.
Depends on the diversity, and the reason, eh?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
I see no problem for parents wanting to choose a school with more or less diversity. However, trying to make a school more or less diverse, is not the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.
Different people have different opinions and place priorities on different things. Some people do see some problems when a school is not diverse enough. There are some schools that don't have any diversity - as a result or as a goal.
Anonymous wrote:Local couple at church were recently bragging about 30 percent minority at their high school so I asked their son how he related to black students in his classes. You would have thought I'd insulted him. "I'm in all AP and honors classes. There aren't any black students." Also, he informed me that the best teachers would leave the school if they had to teach those students.
Anonymous wrote:Local couple at church were recently bragging about 30 percent minority at their high school so I asked their son how he related to black students in his classes. You would have thought I'd insulted him. "I'm in all AP and honors classes. There aren't any black students." Also, he informed me that the best teachers would leave the school if they had to teach those students.
Anonymous wrote:People are making too much a deal on the so-called "diversity". Diversity is a result, not a goal. As long as a school does not have any policy or practice that directly favors a certain (ethnic/income level etc.) group, I do not see a problem even if the end result is a "non-diverse" school.