Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to change the rules. It's getting absurd.
Non-DC resident here but curious: What exactly ARE the rules on redshirting? I'm shocked by these threads! I'm in NYC and there is a strict public school rule that all kids born in a given calendar year start K, etc. So you have kids born January-December 2014 all in one grade, etc. I'm not sure under what circumstances exceptions are made but unless you send your kid to private school redshirting is basically not an option. I know a handful of people with Nov/Dec babies for whom the rule really did compel them to look at private schools (this after overspending on real estate in the best public school district prior to getting pregnant) but other than that redshirting really isn't brought up.
NYC resident here too. I don't take a hardline against redshirting -- that would be hypocritical of me as I am redshirting my late December kid (a private that uses year-end cutoff but will allow redshirting in some instances). But I am amused when I read threads worrying about June or other summer birthdays being too young for K ("It just seems so young for K and sitting still!") I'm like June?! Seems old!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to change the rules. It's getting absurd.
Non-DC resident here but curious: What exactly ARE the rules on redshirting? I'm shocked by these threads! I'm in NYC and there is a strict public school rule that all kids born in a given calendar year start K, etc. So you have kids born January-December 2014 all in one grade, etc. I'm not sure under what circumstances exceptions are made but unless you send your kid to private school redshirting is basically not an option. I know a handful of people with Nov/Dec babies for whom the rule really did compel them to look at private schools (this after overspending on real estate in the best public school district prior to getting pregnant) but other than that redshirting really isn't brought up.
NYC resident here too. I don't take a hardline against redshirting -- that would be hypocritical of me as I am redshirting my late December kid (a private that uses year-end cutoff but will allow redshirting in some instances). But I am amused when I read threads worrying about June or other summer birthdays being too young for K ("It just seems so young for K and sitting still!") I'm like June?! Seems old!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to change the rules. It's getting absurd.
Non-DC resident here but curious: What exactly ARE the rules on redshirting? I'm shocked by these threads! I'm in NYC and there is a strict public school rule that all kids born in a given calendar year start K, etc. So you have kids born January-December 2014 all in one grade, etc. I'm not sure under what circumstances exceptions are made but unless you send your kid to private school redshirting is basically not an option. I know a handful of people with Nov/Dec babies for whom the rule really did compel them to look at private schools (this after overspending on real estate in the best public school district prior to getting pregnant) but other than that redshirting really isn't brought up.
Anonymous wrote:Get a grip. A hobby. Something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if you promise to complain non stop about him not being challenged enough.
Yes.
"My son is GIFTED. He's doing third grade math in second grade!"
Yeah, but he's 9, so technically he should be doing fourth grade math. Actually, he's a little slow . ..
Anonymous wrote:They need to change the rules. It's getting absurd.
Anonymous wrote:You suburbanites are so weird - why would you want to a admit that you’re child is developmentally behind and so needs to be held back an entire year?
I understand that you think it’s some kind of advantage, but it’s really an admission. I am sorry for you all. And you are going to have to have a big talk with your 19 year old high school attending sons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh, my late-July boy, who went on time, is always one of the youngest, but I guess I frame it as "He's doing so great AND he's one of the youngest! He must be super smart!"And conversely, when he has issues like talking too much and trouble sitting still, I can also rationalize "He'll grow out of it! He's nearly a year younger than some of the others--of course his behavior isn't quite as mature!" See, send your kids on time, and you can rationalize BOTH ways with me!
It is interesting that some people draw the same conclusion you did, while others hear the same feedback from teachers and think, "Oh no! We should hold him back--he wasn't ready for K, he needs more time to mature."
Anonymous wrote:Huh, my late-July boy, who went on time, is always one of the youngest, but I guess I frame it as "He's doing so great AND he's one of the youngest! He must be super smart!"And conversely, when he has issues like talking too much and trouble sitting still, I can also rationalize "He'll grow out of it! He's nearly a year younger than some of the others--of course his behavior isn't quite as mature!" See, send your kids on time, and you can rationalize BOTH ways with me!
And conversely, when he has issues like talking too much and trouble sitting still, I can also rationalize "He'll grow out of it! He's nearly a year younger than some of the others--of course his behavior isn't quite as mature!" See, send your kids on time, and you can rationalize BOTH ways with me!
Anonymous wrote:You suburbanites are so weird - why would you want to a admit that you’re child is developmentally behind and so needs to be held back an entire year?
I understand that you think it’s some kind of advantage, but it’s really an admission. I am sorry for you all. And you are going to have to have a big talk with your 19 year old high school attending sons.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: a Venmo diagram of redshirters and anti-vaxxers would be a circle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if you promise to complain non stop about him not being challenged enough.
Yes.