Anonymous wrote:Bilingual kids are smart, it has been researched. This doesn't always translate to success in iq tests
Also, iq is fluid and can grow in time
Iq tests are cultural:a question could have the word drapes instead of curtains, and confuse the test taker
Some teachers are not that good. A teacher should be able to maintain the focus of the students and be able to teach
Interest in the topic is a big predicter of success. A teacher should be able to create this in the classroom
Anonymous wrote:My kid has an IQ of 95, which is low average. He gets straight As in school. Please do not judge people on IQ. Humans are complex creatures.
Anonymous wrote:So many things to unpack in this post.
IQ tests on first graders are notoriously unreliable. They are particularly unreliable for children who have disabilities, live in poverty, or are being educated in a language that isn't their dominant language. I'd be very hesitant to make any kind of prediction about a child's future based on an IQ test at that age. In fact, I know more than child who tested quite low (IQ score below 80) who now attends an Ivy League school.
The second thing I'd encourage you to do is to broaden your understanding of what "college" is. I think that sometimes if someone did college the traditional way, where they chose a college with a national reputation, lived in campus, took a full course load of credit bearing for 4 straight years, and earned a bachelor's degree, they can think that that's what college is. But college can look many different ways. It can include classes that lead to a certificate and a career as a child care provider, or a carpenter, or a dog groomer. It can include people taking one or two classes at a time, and getting a degree in 10 years, instead of 2. It can include people with a variety of disabilities taking classes for credit with accommodations (e.g. braille textbooks), or support (e.g. a tutor), or non credit classes with modifications (e.g. the students referenced above with Down syndrome and other types of intellectual disabilities). All of these people are college students too. Given the wide variety of ways that there are to attend college, college really can be a choice for everyone.
The last thing to remember is that the goal isn't that every kid goes to college, it's that every kid graduates in a position to be able to make that choice for themselves. What does that mean? It means that their reading, writing and math skills are as strong as they can be. It means that they have experience exploring challenging content, taking positions, and defending them with evidence. It means that they know about academic honesty. It also means that they've learned to manage a complicated schedule and workload, and to interact with a variety of adults. Interestingly, even if a kid doesn't choose to go to college, or to go right to college, these skills will serve them well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's what SATs are for. A first grader may have other issues that haven't allowed him to fully develop to his full IQ potential yet.
Overwhelming majority of colleges admit anyone with a pulse. Only the top 100 or so have any sort of admissions standards. And new trend amongst state schools and crummy privates is to remove all math and science requirements because so many of the dummies they admit can't earn even a 2.0 in college algebra and chemistry. Days of a bachelors degree teasing out IQ are long gone.
What a disgusting comment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to back to school at a local university and noticed a few students there who had Down syndrome. I know their IQ can vary, but I’m pretty sure they were <90.
Was this UVA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. They have already been tested and while they have low IQs, they don’t qualify for an IEP. What will their future be?
Plumbers, electricians, carpenters who will out earn the college educated particularly teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Bilingualism researcher here. While there are documented advantages to bilingualism (enhanced executive functioning, lower rates of Alzheimers), it is simply not true that bilinguals are smarter or have a higher IQ than their monolingual counterparts.
Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. They have already been tested and while they have low IQs, they don’t qualify for an IEP. What will their future be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid has an IQ of 95, which is low average. He gets straight As in school. Please do not judge people on IQ. Humans are complex creatures.
I have a background in assessment. 95 is NOT low average. It is average. A standard deviation is 15 points each direction so average is technically 85-115, but most score guides say something like 91-109 is average. If you took the test on another day with a different tester an d maybe more rest,the score may have been say 105.
I can also tell you a colleague of mine who is a therapist has seen seen so many youngsters with high IQs, we're talking 140 and higher who can't seem to find themselves, get through college or maintain a job. IQ is one piece of a complicated puzzle. Too many DCUMers are obsessed with it. (Not you PP, but I have read so many eyebrow raising posts.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's what SATs are for. A first grader may have other issues that haven't allowed him to fully develop to his full IQ potential yet.
Overwhelming majority of colleges admit anyone with a pulse. Only the top 100 or so have any sort of admissions standards. And new trend amongst state schools and crummy privates is to remove all math and science requirements because so many of the dummies they admit can't earn even a 2.0 in college algebra and chemistry. Days of a bachelors degree teasing out IQ are long gone.
Anonymous wrote:I have a "low IQ" based on school assessments. I can share my own story.
I went to a big SEC school and flourished. I graduated with a perfect GPA and went to peace corps (because I didn't know what to do with my life...maybe I was just too "low IQ" to figure it out.").
I returned and decided to attend law school. I actually surprisingly scored a 176 on the LSAT (which is one of the highest scores one could pull on that test).
I went to an elite law school, clerked, did a stint in a big firm and am now happily am a fed (even more happy now that I'm getting paid).
What that entire experience taught me was that IQ tests are really a flawed tool for assessing intelligence. Incredibly flawed. And most importantly, IQ isn't a static thing. It obviously changes since my LSAT score allows me to join MENSA while the elementary school assessments bordered on the line of a learning disability.
Anonymous wrote:My kid has an IQ of 95, which is low average. He gets straight As in school. Please do not judge people on IQ. Humans are complex creatures.
Anonymous wrote:That's what SATs are for. A first grader may have other issues that haven't allowed him to fully develop to his full IQ potential yet.