Anonymous wrote:I literally just (like 10mins ago) drove by the school on the way to an open house and there is a homeless man sleeping on a bench in front of the school. We drove a block further down the road to piney branch and flower to get gas and the number of homeless there was eye opening. I read all the love for the area as an out of towner but sort of question it after visiting as simple propaganda. Readers beware the overall area is quite run down, I wouldn’t feel comfortable with my kids running around unsupervised. I am not sure I would go out there at night without a group.
Anonymous wrote:I literally just (like 10mins ago) drove by the school on the way to an open house and there is a homeless man sleeping on a bench in front of the school. We drove a block further down the road to piney branch and flower to get gas and the number of homeless there was eye opening. I read all the love for the area as an out of towner but sort of question it after visiting as simple propaganda. Readers beware the overall area is quite run down, I wouldn’t feel comfortable with my kids running around unsupervised. I am not sure I would go out there at night without a group.
Anonymous wrote:If this is a serious post, I would not risk it unless this is an area that you would want to live in. No one has paid attention to the set aside spots for in boundary kids that don't score as high as the rest of the county until now. Now that they are getting more attention, its likely that they will go away or they will need to be given to URM in boundary kids who honestly deserve a spot more than lower scoring white kids who happen to live in boundary.
Anonymous wrote:I literally just (like 10mins ago) drove by the school on the way to an open house and there is a homeless man sleeping on a bench in front of the school. We drove a block further down the road to piney branch and flower to get gas and the number of homeless there was eye opening. I read all the love for the area as an out of towner but sort of question it after visiting as simple propaganda. Readers beware the overall area is quite run down, I wouldn’t feel comfortable with my kids running around unsupervised. I am not sure I would go out there at night without a group.
Anonymous wrote:The OP's question becomes less and less relevant the more social engineering is applied to the Magnet schools. As more unprepared kids are admitted, either the curriculum will need to be slowed down or changed in a way that will support the changing student population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The OP's question becomes less and less relevant the more social engineering is applied to the Magnet schools. As more unprepared kids are admitted, either the curriculum will need to be slowed down or changed in a way that will support the changing student population.
When you say "social engineering", what do you mean, specifically? Could you please provide some examples?
Could you please also provide the source of your information supporting your statement that unprepared kids are being admitted?
From a post in an earlier thread (https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/180/757740.page)
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/...de%205%20Parent%20FAQ's%20.pdf
And here is the excerpt:
Has the program itself changed as a result of the new screening process for the Science, math, computer science program?
We still have many top math students in our new sixth grade class, and we are seeing a greater diversity in ability. This is an important opportunity for highly-able students to be able to step up into a more rigorous curriculum. What has changed is not the rigor of the program or our expectations of students. What has changed is instruction and what the teachers need to do. Our teachers are expected to provide supports and scaffolding to help all magnet students attain the level of mastery of students working at a high level in mathematics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The OP's question becomes less and less relevant the more social engineering is applied to the Magnet schools. As more unprepared kids are admitted, either the curriculum will need to be slowed down or changed in a way that will support the changing student population.
When you say "social engineering", what do you mean, specifically? Could you please provide some examples?
Could you please also provide the source of your information supporting your statement that unprepared kids are being admitted?
From a post in an earlier thread (https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/180/757740.page)
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/...de%205%20Parent%20FAQ's%20.pdf
And here is the excerpt:
Has the program itself changed as a result of the new screening process for the Science, math, computer science program?
We still have many top math students in our new sixth grade class, and we are seeing a greater diversity in ability. This is an important opportunity for highly-able students to be able to step up into a more rigorous curriculum. What has changed is not the rigor of the program or our expectations of students. What has changed is instruction and what the teachers need to do. Our teachers are expected to provide supports and scaffolding to help all magnet students attain the level of mastery of students working at a high level in mathematics.
Also, since MCPS changed the admissions criteria for CES along the same lines, what happened there is also very instructive. In DCUM someone had posted a link to a report (from the post?) which described summer prep classes that MCPS conducted for those admitted but not ready for the CES program.
I don't think anyone has demonstrated that the admissions criteria for the CES program has changed. Rather, more spots have opened up (which was needed) and that might mean that the "top" 10 percent at a given school gets the chance to participate rather than the "top" 3 percent.
I found the article you reference, and a quick skim did not turn up a program for kids "admitted but not ready." Rather, it seemed there were programs for kids who might be competitive, but who didn't have access to the kind of enrichment that middle class and upper middle class kids participate in.
The article is also a little sloppy in conflating CES programs with middle school magnets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is something that might be of interest to those who are thinking about trying for Takoma Park Middle Magnet Program.
Not everyone is aware of the fact that kids living within the boundaries have greater chance to get to the program and many
plan ahead.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/779576.page
This makes me wonder.. Are people really willing to uproot and move to an objectively not-so-great neighborhood so that their self-proclaimed 'gifted children' had 'greater chance' of attending a three-year-program in middle school?
Are you serious?
Whether a neighborhood is "great" is entirely subjective. Many people love Takoma Park.
Indeed, if only fewer people loved Takoma Park, then I could afford to live there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The OP's question becomes less and less relevant the more social engineering is applied to the Magnet schools. As more unprepared kids are admitted, either the curriculum will need to be slowed down or changed in a way that will support the changing student population.
When you say "social engineering", what do you mean, specifically? Could you please provide some examples?
Could you please also provide the source of your information supporting your statement that unprepared kids are being admitted?
From a post in an earlier thread (https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/180/757740.page)
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/...de%205%20Parent%20FAQ's%20.pdf
And here is the excerpt:
Has the program itself changed as a result of the new screening process for the Science, math, computer science program?
We still have many top math students in our new sixth grade class, and we are seeing a greater diversity in ability. This is an important opportunity for highly-able students to be able to step up into a more rigorous curriculum. What has changed is not the rigor of the program or our expectations of students. What has changed is instruction and what the teachers need to do. Our teachers are expected to provide supports and scaffolding to help all magnet students attain the level of mastery of students working at a high level in mathematics.
Also, since MCPS changed the admissions criteria for CES along the same lines, what happened there is also very instructive. In DCUM someone had posted a link to a report (from the post?) which described summer prep classes that MCPS conducted for those admitted but not ready for the CES program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The OP's question becomes less and less relevant the more social engineering is applied to the Magnet schools. As more unprepared kids are admitted, either the curriculum will need to be slowed down or changed in a way that will support the changing student population.
When you say "social engineering", what do you mean, specifically? Could you please provide some examples?
Could you please also provide the source of your information supporting your statement that unprepared kids are being admitted?
From a post in an earlier thread (https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/180/757740.page)
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/...de%205%20Parent%20FAQ's%20.pdf
And here is the excerpt:
Has the program itself changed as a result of the new screening process for the Science, math, computer science program?
We still have many top math students in our new sixth grade class, and we are seeing a greater diversity in ability. This is an important opportunity for highly-able students to be able to step up into a more rigorous curriculum. What has changed is not the rigor of the program or our expectations of students. What has changed is instruction and what the teachers need to do. Our teachers are expected to provide supports and scaffolding to help all magnet students attain the level of mastery of students working at a high level in mathematics.