Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP please give us statistics for how many abortions occur after viability and please tell us the reasons women seek out such abortions at that stage. Real life cases please, not just something you made up.
Until you can discuss these things there is no use taking with you about anything.
If it happens ONCE, that's enough.
Anonymous wrote:Wild. Let's see what happens when the first pregnant woman is murdered. Democrats rejected the Republicans attempt to strengthen the rights of the unborn in crimes.
It truly is playing God.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-passes-abortion-bill-late-term-if-mothers-health-is-at-risk-today-2019-01-23/
If you dive inti the text of the bill, it becomes apparent that it's so much more than just a full term abortion law. It also effectively allows for post birth abortion, and removes medical qualifications for those people who perform abortions.
It's now harder to be a tattoo artist in NY than perform an abortion.
Is this what we want?
It allows nurse practitioners, licensed midwives, and physician assistants to perform some abortions. How is being in one of those categories “easier” than being a tattoo artist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
Because beyond being a mom, I am a person, and my own health and life has innate value.
This is part of why NY is a maker state, not a failed red state, by the by: equality for adults leads to better outcomes for all families and children over longer terms.
1) more people are fleeing NY than moving in.
2) being aborted is not a "better outcome" if you happen to be the one getting aborted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-passes-abortion-bill-late-term-if-mothers-health-is-at-risk-today-2019-01-23/
If you dive inti the text of the bill, it becomes apparent that it's so much more than just a full term abortion law. It also effectively allows for post birth abortion, and removes medical qualifications for those people who perform abortions.
It's now harder to be a tattoo artist in NY than perform an abortion.
Is this what we want?
It allows nurse practitioners, licensed midwives, and physician assistants to perform some abortions. How is being in one of those categories “easier” than being a tattoo artist?
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-passes-abortion-bill-late-term-if-mothers-health-is-at-risk-today-2019-01-23/
If you dive inti the text of the bill, it becomes apparent that it's so much more than just a full term abortion law. It also effectively allows for post birth abortion, and removes medical qualifications for those people who perform abortions.
It's now harder to be a tattoo artist in NY than perform an abortion.
Is this what we want?
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-passes-abortion-bill-late-term-if-mothers-health-is-at-risk-today-2019-01-23/
If you dive inti the text of the bill, it becomes apparent that it's so much more than just a full term abortion law. It also effectively allows for post birth abortion, and removes medical qualifications for those people who perform abortions.
It's now harder to be a tattoo artist in NY than perform an abortion.
Is this what we want?
Anonymous wrote:OP please give us statistics for how many abortions occur after viability and please tell us the reasons women seek out such abortions at that stage. Real life cases please, not just something you made up.
Until you can discuss these things there is no use taking with you about anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post birth abortion? LOL. Yeah okay
What else would you choose to call a procedure that kills a fetus that has been inadvertently born durning an abortion?
That is not the goal of the law and I do not believe this happens on a remotely regular basis. If it does it is a tragic accident. No one is murdering viable children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wild. Let's see what happens when the first pregnant woman is murdered. Democrats rejected the Republicans attempt to strengthen the rights of the unborn in crimes.
It truly is playing God.
The pregnant woman and only the pregnant woman gets to decide whether to have an abortion.
If anyone else decides for her and harms her embryo/fetus, it’s a crime.
I don’t see the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Wild. Let's see what happens when the first pregnant woman is murdered. Democrats rejected the Republicans attempt to strengthen the rights of the unborn in crimes.
It truly is playing God.