Anonymous wrote:I work at a tech company, so most people here are fairly well paid.
Had a coworker who just came back from a trip abroad complain that she would have to pay back her credit cards for the next 6 months or so.
Then a few weeks later she told me she just got a $3,000 living room set. "You can't just have nothing in your living room!!!"
I grew up poor and my parents were living paycheck to paycheck because they made very little money, so I understand the poverty cycle rather too well. It's insulting when you see people with well paying jobs willingly subject themselves to that life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you guys know how much housing and childcare cost around here?
I'm the person who posted in the furlough thread about feeling stupid for. buying 3 pieces of furniture. For context, my living room has had literally only seating i have scavenged from the curb for free for the last 2.5 years. Finally I got tired of living off other people's trash and spent $300 on a used coffee table and 2 chairs. Replacing the trash couch is still too expensive, that will wait. And i still don't have curtains, just cheap blinds.
Meanwhile, I have spent $1500/month on day care during this period, and until I got a federal job this spring i was spending $900/month for family health insurance. But you really think it's consumerism that holds people back from saving? How deeply out of touch and moralistic.
That's your situation.
From the other thread, people are talking about Prada and Gucci and plane tickets and cleaning services...and yet they say money is tight. Isn't that consumerism? Over spending?
Housing and day care are expensive. Therefore, people must minimize housing costs and make tough decisions about when to have a baby, how many kids to have, etc. And obviously two incomes tend to be better than one.
Omg, Poors shouldn’t have kids.
And minimize housing costs? Pray tell how?
And btw, pretty sure if they are paying for day care, they have two incomes!!
Anonymous wrote:FFS people. This has been studied extensively. The vast majority of people are in the whole b/c rising housing, education, and medical.
Maybe they could save up $1K by returning to the 90s and forsaking a cell phone for a beeper.
But what happens is they save that $1k, then it is seized for a medical debt. Bought goods are harder to seize, so by spending it, they get to ‘keep’ it.
But they are on the edge to begin with b/c housing, medical, and education.
And I agree, lack of unions goes right along with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you guys know how much housing and childcare cost around here?
I'm the person who posted in the furlough thread about feeling stupid for. buying 3 pieces of furniture. For context, my living room has had literally only seating i have scavenged from the curb for free for the last 2.5 years. Finally I got tired of living off other people's trash and spent $300 on a used coffee table and 2 chairs. Replacing the trash couch is still too expensive, that will wait. And i still don't have curtains, just cheap blinds.
Meanwhile, I have spent $1500/month on day care during this period, and until I got a federal job this spring i was spending $900/month for family health insurance. But you really think it's consumerism that holds people back from saving? How deeply out of touch and moralistic.
That's your situation.
From the other thread, people are talking about Prada and Gucci and plane tickets and cleaning services...and yet they say money is tight. Isn't that consumerism? Over spending?
Housing and day care are expensive. Therefore, people must minimize housing costs and make tough decisions about when to have a baby, how many kids to have, etc. And obviously two incomes tend to be better than one.
Omg, Poors shouldn’t have kids.
And minimize housing costs? Pray tell how?
And btw, pretty sure if they are paying for day care, they have two incomes!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you guys know how much housing and childcare cost around here?
I'm the person who posted in the furlough thread about feeling stupid for. buying 3 pieces of furniture. For context, my living room has had literally only seating i have scavenged from the curb for free for the last 2.5 years. Finally I got tired of living off other people's trash and spent $300 on a used coffee table and 2 chairs. Replacing the trash couch is still too expensive, that will wait. And i still don't have curtains, just cheap blinds.
Meanwhile, I have spent $1500/month on day care during this period, and until I got a federal job this spring i was spending $900/month for family health insurance. But you really think it's consumerism that holds people back from saving? How deeply out of touch and moralistic.
That's your situation.
From the other thread, people are talking about Prada and Gucci and plane tickets and cleaning services...and yet they say money is tight. Isn't that consumerism? Over spending?
Housing and day care are expensive. Therefore, people must minimize housing costs and make tough decisions about when to have a baby, how many kids to have, etc. And obviously two incomes tend to be better than one.
Anonymous wrote:Do you guys know how much housing and childcare cost around here?
I'm the person who posted in the furlough thread about feeling stupid for. buying 3 pieces of furniture. For context, my living room has had literally only seating i have scavenged from the curb for free for the last 2.5 years. Finally I got tired of living off other people's trash and spent $300 on a used coffee table and 2 chairs. Replacing the trash couch is still too expensive, that will wait. And i still don't have curtains, just cheap blinds.
Meanwhile, I have spent $1500/month on day care during this period, and until I got a federal job this spring i was spending $900/month for family health insurance. But you really think it's consumerism that holds people back from saving? How deeply out of touch and moralistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unions!
And yes, people should reject consumerism. It’s stupid. But unions are a way to fix lots of problems.
How would unions improve the savings rates?
They might improve salaries, maybe, but that has nothing to do with savings.
Of course it does. When you make more money it’s easier to save.
So your theory is that wages for everything should be higher but the cost of everything will remain the same?
Or is it that now that once people have more money they won’t change their consumption habits? Won’t buy a nicer home/car/clothes/vacation etc?
Are you saying that wages for middle and lower class workers are high enough and they should just spend less, despite evidence that wages have been pretty much stagnant for decades except for the top 10% and the fact that costs such as housing and education have skyrocketed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unions!
And yes, people should reject consumerism. It’s stupid. But unions are a way to fix lots of problems.
How would unions improve the savings rates?
They might improve salaries, maybe, but that has nothing to do with savings.
Of course it does. When you make more money it’s easier to save.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you think people are buying? We hardly buy anything other than food and with monthly bills in addition to student debt, we have no spending power to speak of. What is worse is that people think my dh and I are wealthy because of our jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Well that sounds like 2007 all over again. And yet somehow holiday retail sales were record high?? I just don’t get what people are thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unions!
And yes, people should reject consumerism. It’s stupid. But unions are a way to fix lots of problems.
How would unions improve the savings rates?
They might improve salaries, maybe, but that has nothing to do with savings.
Of course it does. When you make more money it’s easier to save.
So your theory is that wages for everything should be higher but the cost of everything will remain the same?
Or is it that now that once people have more money they won’t change their consumption habits? Won’t buy a nicer home/car/clothes/vacation etc?