Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, are you talking about ballet?
I think it's gymnastics. Are there other sports where a growth spurt would be a problem? OP most gymnasts, and kids for that matter, go through a growth spurt and they figure it out pretty quickly.
Anonymous wrote:OP, are you talking about ballet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quitting or continuing a sport isn't going to be the difference maker for college admissions. Kids change as do interests but that doesn't sound like the situation here.
If the family can no longer afford for her to participate in the sport, then tell her that, and deal with the disappointment and fallout (and maybe sock that $4K in a 529 for her).
But advising or requiring your daughter to quit something she loves (that you can still, probably afford) because she isn't doing as well relative to other competitors sounds awful OP. The whole notion of strategizing or optimizing is really off-putting OP. You compete in sports to be healthy, to make friends and to improve, not just win.
Also - FWIW donut hole families are far more likely to get financial aid and scholarship money at the next level down of colleges, not Ivy-grade ones. Broaden your thinking.
Yes, it's awful, but you and I both know that if she put that 15-20 hours per week onto some academic team, she'll probably win something, which WILL count towards admission, and is basically free of cost to the family. As is, she is wasting her time and our money. I don't think I should say it to her like that, though. Kids are fragile, and studios do all they can to hold on to all of them for $$$, so they tell kids their potential unrealistically.
Hopefully she'll just see it for herself by spring.
Anonymous wrote:Unless your child is a recruited athlete at the college she wants to attend then participation in a sport carries the same weight in college admissions as any other EC of equivalent commitment. A letter from a HS or club coach is irrelevant in college admissions and in college recruiting for sports.
Anonymous wrote:You are all crazy. If she wants to continue because she likes it, and you can afford the 5K to keep playing, let her play. This attitude toward doing everything as it relates to college admissions is kind of silly and overblown. Yes, it is super hard to get into college - if she the academics to Ivy League, it won't matter if she does sport, theater, academic team or whatever as long as she does something - which seems like she wants to do that!
Anonymous wrote:"(sorry, that was not clear - both my husband and I chose lower-paying jobs because we love what we do. We both had opportunities to switch to somewhat higher paying and less rewarding jobs, probably the difference between middle class and upper middle class, but we are not willing to make that change)"
So neither of you "optimize your outcomes" but you think your DC should try it some other way. Why?
Or do you and DH just think you love your jobs or just prefer not to deal with change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"What makes you so certain that the important life lesson is "powering through"? Why not "utilizing your resources appropriately to optimize the outcome"? Just curious. OP."
Because your DD loves the activity. Do you actually love any activity?
Both my husband and I love our jobs. If we did not, we could be a donut family, as opposed to a donut hole.I dunno, maybe it's generational?
Anonymous wrote:"What makes you so certain that the important life lesson is "powering through"? Why not "utilizing your resources appropriately to optimize the outcome"? Just curious. OP."
Because your DD loves the activity. Do you actually love any activity?
I dunno, maybe it's generational?