Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the poster you're responding to but YES.
Brent was a failing school 20 years ago that didn't serve kids well, OOB or IB, and wasn't popular.
Why would we want to go back to that?
Another different poster but I agree that schools should receive credit for retaining IB kids. In a system of choice, having a high IB percentage means that even with options, people are sticking with you.
Anonymous wrote:Not the poster you're responding to but YES.
Brent was a failing school 20 years ago that didn't serve kids well, OOB or IB, and wasn't popular.
Why would we want to go back to that?
Anonymous wrote:Not the poster you're responding to but YES.
Brent was a failing school 20 years ago that didn't serve kids well, OOB or IB, and wasn't popular.
Why would we want to go back to that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they still have a bullying problem? That could be part of it.
Oh come on. What idiotic things people post. We've been at Brent for 7 years for several children (two shy, one with an obvious disability) and seen almost no bullying along the way. The new playground monitors/outdoor activity leaders this year have been terrific. Brent playground mania is a thing of the past, despite the squeeze on space due to the 2 trailers.
Anonymous wrote:What's not cool is this goofy new rating system. Where's the credit for 100% in-boundary K classes? Where's the credit for more than 80% in-boundary this school year, up from around 5% in-boundary 20 years ago? Yes, that's right. No credit. No good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's not cool is this goofy new rating system. Where's the credit for 100% in-boundary K classes? Where's the credit for more than 80% in-boundary this school year, up from around 5% in-boundary 20 years ago? Yes, that's right. No credit. No good.
Well for starters it's a city-wide rating system, and that metric isn't applicable to charter schools.
Anonymous wrote:
New principal is absolutely fantastic for examining everything and pushing for constant improvement - for kids below, at, and above grade level. So I look forward to seeing how things change in the coming years.
Anonymous wrote:What's not cool is this goofy new rating system. Where's the credit for 100% in-boundary K classes? Where's the credit for more than 80% in-boundary this school year, up from around 5% in-boundary 20 years ago? Yes, that's right. No credit. No good.
Anonymous wrote:For political reasons, DCPS had to come up with a metric that wouldn't accord every school that's overwhelmingly white 5 stars. They did.