Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was Bunker Hill’s principal before enrollment dropped snd it closed temporarily. She then became the principal of Ross ES for 3 years. She fired anyone who did not bend to her ( thus firing a couple of very competent teachers).
The school had 3 counselors ( former teachers) at one point while different subs were covering teacherless classrooms. That’s when the in boundary parents ( about 15 % of the overall population back then) pulled their kids out and enrolled them elsewhere. The school flourished after she left becoming 80% in boundary a few years later.
I second this. Her leadership at Ross was very questionable. Maybe she is more effective in admin outside of the school environment. Maybe. Her decisions were swift without a lot of foresight about the impact on the students and families.
She hasn't made any major changes yet has she? I think part of why she's appealing is that not much has changed. When she is permanent and starts shaking things up we may not like her as much as we do now.
The Post said she's made 2 significant deputy hires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was Bunker Hill’s principal before enrollment dropped snd it closed temporarily. She then became the principal of Ross ES for 3 years. She fired anyone who did not bend to her ( thus firing a couple of very competent teachers).
The school had 3 counselors ( former teachers) at one point while different subs were covering teacherless classrooms. That’s when the in boundary parents ( about 15 % of the overall population back then) pulled their kids out and enrolled them elsewhere. The school flourished after she left becoming 80% in boundary a few years later.
I second this. Her leadership at Ross was very questionable. Maybe she is more effective in admin outside of the school environment. Maybe. Her decisions were swift without a lot of foresight about the impact on the students and families.
She hasn't made any major changes yet has she? I think part of why she's appealing is that not much has changed. When she is permanent and starts shaking things up we may not like her as much as we do now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was Bunker Hill’s principal before enrollment dropped snd it closed temporarily. She then became the principal of Ross ES for 3 years. She fired anyone who did not bend to her ( thus firing a couple of very competent teachers).
The school had 3 counselors ( former teachers) at one point while different subs were covering teacherless classrooms. That’s when the in boundary parents ( about 15 % of the overall population back then) pulled their kids out and enrolled them elsewhere. The school flourished after she left becoming 80% in boundary a few years later.
I second this. Her leadership at Ross was very questionable. Maybe she is more effective in admin outside of the school environment. Maybe. Her decisions were swift without a lot of foresight about the impact on the students and families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was Bunker Hill’s principal before enrollment dropped snd it closed temporarily. She then became the principal of Ross ES for 3 years. She fired anyone who did not bend to her ( thus firing a couple of very competent teachers).
The school had 3 counselors ( former teachers) at one point while different subs were covering teacherless classrooms. That’s when the in boundary parents ( about 15 % of the overall population back then) pulled their kids out and enrolled them elsewhere. The school flourished after she left becoming 80% in boundary a few years later.
I second this. Her leadership at Ross was very questionable. Maybe she is more effective in admin outside of the school environment. Maybe. Her decisions were swift without a lot of foresight about the impact on the students and families.
Anonymous wrote:She was Bunker Hill’s principal before enrollment dropped snd it closed temporarily. She then became the principal of Ross ES for 3 years. She fired anyone who did not bend to her ( thus firing a couple of very competent teachers).
The school had 3 counselors ( former teachers) at one point while different subs were covering teacherless classrooms. That’s when the in boundary parents ( about 15 % of the overall population back then) pulled their kids out and enrolled them elsewhere. The school flourished after she left becoming 80% in boundary a few years later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post reporting that according to sources, Alexander and the head of Indianapolis schools are the finalists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/board-advising-search-for-a-dc-schools-chancellor-convenes/2018/12/01/ba102c2e-f587-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html?utm_term=.ecd745e10a23
Anyone have thoughts on why this would be released/leaked now? The article clearly states that the head of Indianapolis schools backed off the top LA job when his name got leaked, so why would someone drop his name again if the final choice is not Amanda Alexander?
I feel this whole thing is a sham. Just give it to Alexander already and stop with the wait!
Anonymous wrote:Post reporting that according to sources, Alexander and the head of Indianapolis schools are the finalists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/board-advising-search-for-a-dc-schools-chancellor-convenes/2018/12/01/ba102c2e-f587-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html?utm_term=.ecd745e10a23
Anonymous wrote:Regarding Mr. Ferebee.
https://www.theindychannel.com/news/call-6-investigators/attorney-ferebee-covered-up-shana-taylor-case-to-get-60000-raise
Anonymous wrote:DC public schools are headed in a positive direction. It's an exciting time to be in the system. I've heard charter school types before dissing the DC public system, but I think they don't know what they're talking about. The DC public school system is on the rise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post reporting that according to sources, Alexander and the head of Indianapolis schools are the finalists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/board-advising-search-for-a-dc-schools-chancellor-convenes/2018/12/01/ba102c2e-f587-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html?utm_term=.ecd745e10a23
So both are charter school boosters.
DCPS is doomed.
Anonymous wrote:Post reporting that according to sources, Alexander and the head of Indianapolis schools are the finalists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/board-advising-search-for-a-dc-schools-chancellor-convenes/2018/12/01/ba102c2e-f587-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html?utm_term=.ecd745e10a23