Anonymous wrote:I think actually there has been quite a lot of discussion of growth scores on here.
Thing that bothers me is when I see PARCC a bit over valued. I wish we had other metrics as well aside from things like attendance, re-enrollment. We're really putting a lot of weight on this one metric.
Anonymous wrote:I think actually there has been quite a lot of discussion of growth scores on here.
Thing that bothers me is when I see PARCC a bit over valued. I wish we had other metrics as well aside from things like attendance, re-enrollment. We're really putting a lot of weight on this one metric.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren't people already informally doing this by ranking PARCC scores on this very website? Despite the low scores at some schools, there are always parents who pick mediocre schools because they have the "right" demographics or is deemed the "right fit". I don't see how the ESSA will change anything.
Yes people do. But few focus on the growth scores, because it is more complicated and not easily accessible.
So some schools with low or middling PARCC proficiency scores may wind up with strong ratings because they do a good job of moving kids toward proficiency from one year to the next, and some schools ugh great PARCC scores may get lower scores if their student body is doing quite well on PARCC but not doing better each year.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't people already informally doing this by ranking PARCC scores on this very website? Despite the low scores at some schools, there are always parents who pick mediocre schools because they have the "right" demographics or is deemed the "right fit". I don't see how the ESSA will change anything.
Anonymous wrote:
Nonetheless, there will be some surprises and some off a star from expectations.
Example:
CMI - 2 stars
Bridges - 2 stars
Shining stars - 3 stars
Deal - 4 stars
Janney - 5 stars
Stoddert - 5 stars
Mundo Verde - 3 stars
Burroughs - 3 stars
Shepherd - 4 stars
Stokes - 3 stars
ITS - 4 stars
Hearst - 4 stars
DC prep - 4 stars
Anonymous wrote:
Nonetheless, there will be some surprises and some off a star from expectations.
Example:
CMI - 2 stars
Bridges - 2 stars
Shining stars - 3 stars
Deal - 4 stars
Janney - 5 stars
Stoddert - 5 stars
Mundo Verde - 3 stars
Burroughs - 3 stars
Shepherd - 4 stars
Stokes - 3 stars
ITS - 4 stars
Hearst - 4 stars
DC prep - 4 stars
Anonymous wrote:it might help neighborhood schools. If stokes is a 4 and Burroughs is a 3, you'll feel better about Burroughs.Anonymous wrote:I’m not a swami but, i think the Dcps in the richest neighborhoods come out on top followed by a mixture of DCPS in gentrifying neighborhoods mixed with HRCS. DCPS in the poorest neighborhoods and less regarded charter schools occupy the bottom.
It’s not rocket science. This thing is mostly just going to track wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a swami but, i think the Dcps in the richest neighborhoods come out on top followed by a mixture of DCPS in gentrifying neighborhoods mixed with HRCS. DCPS in the poorest neighborhoods and less regarded charter schools occupy the bottom.
It’s not rocket science. This thing is mostly just going to track wealth.
Also SWW and Banneker.
On the charter side some of the KIPPs, DC Preps, BASIS, Latin, LAMB, YY, ITS, etc will do well (same as the PARCC scores).
it might help neighborhood schools. If stokes is a 4 and Burroughs is a 3, you'll feel better about Burroughs.Anonymous wrote:I’m not a swami but, i think the Dcps in the richest neighborhoods come out on top followed by a mixture of DCPS in gentrifying neighborhoods mixed with HRCS. DCPS in the poorest neighborhoods and less regarded charter schools occupy the bottom.
It’s not rocket science. This thing is mostly just going to track wealth.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a swami but, i think the Dcps in the richest neighborhoods come out on top followed by a mixture of DCPS in gentrifying neighborhoods mixed with HRCS. DCPS in the poorest neighborhoods and less regarded charter schools occupy the bottom.
It’s not rocket science. This thing is mostly just going to track wealth.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a swami but, i think the Dcps in the richest neighborhoods come out on top followed by a mixture of DCPS in gentrifying neighborhoods mixed with HRCS. DCPS in the poorest neighborhoods and less regarded charter schools occupy the bottom.
It’s not rocket science. This thing is mostly just going to track wealth.