Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The math emporium brings Tech’s prestige down a peg, IMO. Not the way to learn calculus.
Can you elaborate? What’s the better model and where is it employed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech is the “big state u” now. They aspire to be a school of 30,000. Admissions doesn’t look at recommendations or essays. They dont even want a transcript, they want the student to list their courses and grades on Coalition.
They’ve been on this path for years - just look at the Math “emporium” situation (you take math in a giant computer lab at the mall in a defunct store.)
Nothing wrong with that, you just have to go in with your eyes open.
Also no. There are 4 short essays and they said this year that they are putting much more emphasis on the essays than test scores.
Anonymous wrote:The math emporium brings Tech’s prestige down a peg, IMO. Not the way to learn calculus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W & M had 15,000 applications last year so it appears that somebody applied.
Just saying that it's not like all kids are applying to UVA or W&M as first choices, with VT as the safety.
Maybe back in the day this was the case, but it seems now that the three are of equal stature in the kids' eyes, just different types of kids are applying to each one. That's a good thing I think that they're trying to find the right fit vs. just legacy status. Legacy not as in alumni but legacy as in the past.
My kid is at a STEM magnet so maybe my views are skewed by DC and friends. They report that W&M is more of a SLAC, while VT is the STEM school and UVA is big state U, but they're all equally good according to the kids.
Didn't mean to knock W&M.
You say VT is the STEM school, but I don't think you can say it is stronger in science than UVA or W&M. That isn't to say it isn't good. UVA has the same percentage of majors as VT in Bio/Biomed, Math/Statistics, Computer Sciences, Chemistry, Physics, and W&M has a higher percentage than either. STEM at VT is heavy on engineering. Among national public universities, only Berkeley produces as many STEM PHDs on a per capita basis as W&M. And referring to UVA as Big State U when VT is significantly larger seems like a misnomer.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech is the “big state u” now. They aspire to be a school of 30,000. Admissions doesn’t look at recommendations or essays. They dont even want a transcript, they want the student to list their courses and grades on Coalition.
They’ve been on this path for years - just look at the Math “emporium” situation (you take math in a giant computer lab at the mall in a defunct store.)
Nothing wrong with that, you just have to go in with your eyes open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yes, most in state people will think a Virginia Tech student was a UVA reject. W&M is sui generis.
I don't think you have kept up and have any understanding how difficult it is to get into these schools today. And Tech is a TECH school, like Cal Tech, Purdue, Georgia Tech. Go go there for engineering, vet science, architecture, animal husbandry, etc etc. You don't go to Cal Tech for poly-sci.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech is the “big state u” now. They aspire to be a school of 30,000. Admissions doesn’t look at recommendations or essays. They dont even want a transcript, they want the student to list their courses and grades on Coalition.
They’ve been on this path for years - just look at the Math “emporium” situation (you take math in a giant computer lab at the mall in a defunct store.)
Nothing wrong with that, you just have to go in with your eyes open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yes, most in state people will think a Virginia Tech student was a UVA reject. W&M is sui generis.
I don't think you have kept up and have any understanding how difficult it is to get into these schools today. And Tech is a TECH school, like Cal Tech, Purdue, Georgia Tech. Go go there for engineering, vet science, architecture, animal husbandry, etc etc. You don't go to Cal Tech for poly-sci.